Should I start a new Thread to talk about multi client? I sorry this all had to happen on my thread. I hope I didn't cause it.
My goal is simple I would like to set up some thing that would help HBase compete in the multi cluster up up use cases. The design in this thread I think is a good starting point, but I'm super open to modifying it to improve on it. I just feel as more the cloud and global cluster setups become a thing the more this use case is going to come up, and I would love for HBase to have a simple solution that covers the majority of use cases. Ted Malaska On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Patrick Angeles <patrickange...@gmail.com> wrote: > Beyond the personal insults, he is clearly arguing for the sake of arguing. > Not productive. I'm also with Stack -- moderation is work. Ban. It's not > like there aren't other outlets for this kind of behavior, just don't let > them do it here. > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Huh? This is not about being caremad over some technical issue, this is > > about preserving a productive space for communication free from toxic > > people casting abuse while being "funny" and "smart". Please go back on > the > > original thread and re-read the interaction with Sean. Are you going to > > defend that as within the bounds of acceptable behavior? Is this the > first > > time that has happened? > > > > > > > On Jun 30, 2015, at 5:58 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Moderating is better than outright banning, I think.While Micheal is > > sometimes infuriating, he's also funny and smart. > > > Can we have a group of moderators? I'd volunteer, but not if I'm the > > only one. > > > > > > -- Lars > > > From: Stack <st...@duboce.net> > > > To: Hbase-User <user@hbase.apache.org> > > > Cc: "d...@hbase.apache.org" <d...@hbase.apache.org> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:25 PM > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] correcting abusive behavior on mailing lists was > > (Re: [DISCUSS] Multi-Cluster HBase Client) > > > > > >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > >> > > >> I volunteer to help moderate. > > >> St.Ack > > > Sorry. Changed my mind. I'm not going to do more work because of > Michael. > > > Let the filters do the work for us. Ban him for 3 months. > > > > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> (I took the liberty of moving us off of Ted's feature discussion > > thread) > > >>> > > >>> A three month ban sounds better than a permanent ban. But it still > > seems > > >>> likely to just result in the ban-ee walking away from teh community > or > > >>> escalating. > > >>> > > >>> Would we consider enforcing moderation on posts for the three month > > period > > >>> instead of an outright ban? > > >>> > > >>> It's more work for whomever has moderator rights on the mailing list, > > but > > >>> it provides a better feedback cycle for improved behavior. Presuming > > that > > >>> I > > >>> don't already have such access as a PMC member, I'd be willing to > > >>> volunteer > > >>> to help take on part of the burden. > > >>> > > >>> -Sean > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org > > > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> It was suggested privately that we try a temporary ban first, to be > > >>> clear > > >>>> that current behavior and communication is unacceptable and won't be > > >>>> tolerated further, yet allow for the possibility of a return to the > > >>>> community should the message be received. So let me amend my > proposal > > - > > >>> a > > >>>> three month temporary ban. > > >>>> > > >>>> Also, the reason I am asking for public feedback before calling for > a > > >>> vote > > >>>> is this would be the first time in the history of the project we > would > > >>> take > > >>>> this very unfortunate step. It pains me personally but enough is > > >>> enough, in > > >>>> my opinion. However, if you are not comfortable with that then > please > > >>> speak > > >>>> up and I won't ask the PMC to vote on this. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Andrew Purtell < > apurt...@apache.org > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> I've had enough and would like to ask the user and dev communities > if > > >>>> they > > >>>>> would mind if we vote on a permanent ban of Michael Segal - any and > > >>> all > > >>>>> email accounts he may choose to set up - from all HBase mailing > > lists. > > >>>> The > > >>>>> basic lack of courtesy and constant naysaying is corrosive. Nobody > > >>> trying > > >>>>> to volunteer their time here deserves his continuing abuse. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Michael Segel < > > >>>> michael_se...@hotmail.com> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Sean, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> You’re a developer, or just some higher level primate that pounds > > >>> code? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I don’t want to embarrass you, but what do they teach in > engineering > > >>>>>> schools these days? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Best regards, > > >>>> > > >>>> - Andy > > >>>> > > >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein > > >>>> (via Tom White) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Sean > > > > > >
