Thanks J-D, I have opened a jira here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3826
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
> That make sense, would you mind opening a jira?
>
> Thx,
>
> J-D
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Schubert Zhang wrote:
> > After more test,
Note that we have a compaction recursive enqueue patch on our internal
branches, but we wanted to give it some run time before contributing back
to make sure it was safe. I'll port that to trunk.
On 4/27/11 9:55 AM, "Jean-Daniel Cryans" wrote:
>That make sense, would you mind opening a jira?
>
That make sense, would you mind opening a jira?
Thx,
J-D
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Schubert Zhang wrote:
> After more test, a obvious issue/problem is, the complete of a minor
> compaction does not check if current storefiles need more minor compaction.
>
> I think this may be a bug or l
After more test, a obvious issue/problem is, the complete of a minor
compaction does not check if current storefiles need more minor compaction.
I think this may be a bug or leak.
Try this test:
1. Put many data to a region, then there is 30 storefiles accumulated,
because the backend compaction
I have a busy region, and there are 43 StoreFiles (>
compactionThreshold=8) in this region.
Now, I stopped the client and stopped put new data into it. I expect
these StoreFiles to be compacted later.
But, one day after, these 43 StoreFiles are still there.
It seems the compaction does not work a
