Re: HLog and durability question --0.90 and 0.20

2010-10-13 Thread Ryan Rawson
The performance isn't horrible, hundreds of rows/sec and if you use the write buffer it will speed things up. There is also deferred flush for less durability but vastly increased performance. On Oct 13, 2010 6:47 PM, "Stack" wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Sean Bigdatafun > wrote: >> C

Re: HLog and durability question --0.90 and 0.20

2010-10-13 Thread Stack
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Sean Bigdatafun wrote: > Can someone give me a detailed look at the HLog mechanism for 0.90 > durablity? > I recall that HBase committers claim that data will be truly durable in 0.90 > after the client gets 'ok' acknowledgement from server, while it was not > true

HLog and durability question --0.90 and 0.20

2010-10-11 Thread Sean Bigdatafun
Can someone give me a detailed look at the HLog mechanism for 0.90 durablity? I recall that HBase committers claim that data will be truly durable in 0.90 after the client gets 'ok' acknowledgement from server, while it was not true in 0.20 (i.e., HBase may have the chance to lose the data even it