;
>>> > Which part? The server certainly is thread safe.
>>> > The client is not, at least not all the way through.
>>> >
>>> > The main consideration is HTable, which is not thread safe, you need
>>>to
>>> > create one instance for each thread
>
t; > (HBASE-4805 makes that much cheaper), store the HTable in a ThreadLocal
>> > after creation, or use HTablePool.
>> >
>> > Please let me know if that answers your question.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > -- Lars
>> &g
t; > (HBASE-4805 makes that much cheaper), store the HTable in a ThreadLocal
>> > after creation, or use HTablePool.
>> >
>> > Please let me know if that answers your question.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > -- Lars
>> &g
hread
> > (HBASE-4805 makes that much cheaper), store the HTable in a ThreadLocal
> > after creation, or use HTablePool.
> >
> > Please let me know if that answers your question.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> > - Original Message
answers your question.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Bing Li
> To: hbase-u...@hadoop.apache.org; user
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:10 PM
> Subject: Is HBase Thread-Safety?
>
> Dear all,
>
> Is HBase thr
after
creation, or use HTablePool.
Please let me know if that answers your question.
Thanks.
-- Lars
- Original Message -
From: Bing Li
To: hbase-u...@hadoop.apache.org; user
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:10 PM
Subject: Is HBase Thread-Safety?
Dear all,
Is HBase thread-safety
re: "Is HBase thread-safety?"
HTable instances are not thread safe, though.
http://hbase.apache.org/apidocs/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/HTable.html
On 4/12/12 6:10 PM, "Bing Li" wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>Is HBase thread-safety? Do I need to consid
There only 'transaction' HBase provides is row-level transaction.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Bing Li wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Is HBase thread-safety? Do I need to consider the consistency issue when
> manipulating HBase?
>
> Thanks so much!
>
> Best regards,
> Bing
>
--
--Sean
