Re: Java API vs Hbase Thrift

riginal--- >> From: "Vladimir Rodionov "<vladrodio...@gmail.com> >> Date: 2016/1/15 06:31:34 >> To: "user@hbase.apache.org"<user@hbase.apache.org>; >> Subject: Re: Java API vs Hbase Thrift >> >> >>>> I have to ac

Re: Java API vs Hbase Thrift

/1/15 06:31:34 > To: "user@hbase.apache.org"<user@hbase.apache.org>; > Subject: Re: Java API vs Hbase Thrift > > > >> I have to access hbase using Java API will it be fast like thrift. > > Bear in mind that when you use Thrift Gateway/Thrift API you access HBase &

Re: Java API vs Hbase Thrift

base.apache.org"<user@hbase.apache.org>; Subject: Re: Java API vs Hbase Thrift >> I have to access hbase using Java API will it be fast like thrift. Bear in mind that when you use Thrift Gateway/Thrift API you access HBase RegionServer through the single gateway server, when you use Java A

Re: Java API vs Hbase Thrift

>> I have to access hbase using Java API will it be fast like thrift. Bear in mind that when you use Thrift Gateway/Thrift API you access HBase RegionServer through the single gateway server, when you use Java API - you access Region Server directly. Java API is much more scalable. -Vlad On

Java API vs Hbase Thrift

Hi, I am currently accessing records via Hbase thrift server and it is fast. If I have to access hbase using Java API will it be fast like thrift. Thanks

Re: Java API vs Hbase Thrift

Hi In my experience ... faster ... and from what I remember there was functionality in Java that thrift was missing. What I understand is that the Thrift client uses the Java API. Regards, Néstor On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Rajeshkumar J wrote: > Hi, > > I

Re: Java API vs Hbase Thrift

Java api should be same or better in performance as compared to Thrift api. With Thrift api there is an extra hop. So, most of the time java api would be better for performance. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 12, 2016, at 4:29 AM, Rajeshkumar J > wrote: > > Hi, >