I can work on that. Since it is reading the restore data from a snapshot it is
definitely not changing. I wanted to make sure there was not some inherent
thread model under the scanner that prohibited this from working.
On 10/20/16, 8:30 AM, "Ted Yu" wrote:
>Can you come up with unit test
Can you come up with unit test that shows what you observed ?
You may have seen the javadoc for ClientSideRegionScanner :
* A client scanner for a region opened for read-only on the client side.
Assumes region data
* is not changing.
Cheers
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Randy Fox wrote:
Hi,
I have attempted to parallelize the TableSnapshotScanner by taking the
ClientSideRegionScanner’s it generates and sending them each to their own
thread to read the results. I am finding that I do not get all the rows per
region when I do this. It seems the more parallelism the less data I
