bq. when I removed the filter, it ran fine in 0.94
Can you disclose more information about your filter ?
BTW 0.94.6 was just released which is fully compatible with 0.94.2
Cheers
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Agarwal, Saurabh
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are in process of migrating from 0.92.1 to 0.
bq. I checked thread dump
If there was no exception in region server logs, thread dump of region
server when your coprocessor was running would reveal where it got stuck.
>From your description below, looks like you can utilize HBASE-5416 Improve
performance of scans with some kind of filters.
b
processor is getting called.
Also logs showed it keep processing. But the speed is much slower compare to
0.92.
Regards,
Saurabh.
-Original Message-
From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhih...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 6:57 PM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: coprocessor is ti
; -Original Message-
> From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhih...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 6:57 PM
> To: user@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Re: coprocessor is timing out in 0.94
>
> bq. I checked thread dump
>
> If there was no exception in region server logs, t
t points show that coprocessor is getting
> called. Also logs showed it keep processing. But the speed is much slower
> compare to 0.92.
>
> Regards,
> Saurabh.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhih...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 6:
is2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:36 PM
To: user@hbase.apache.org; Agarwal, Saurabh [CCC-OT_IT]; yuzhih...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: coprocessor is timing out in 0.94
Regards, Saurabh.
I see that you are using SingleColumnValueFilter. Look for these links:
http://gbif.blogspot.com/2012
* Marcos Luis Ortiz Valmaseda [mailto:marcosluis2...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:36 PM
> *To:* user@hbase.apache.org; Agarwal, Saurabh [CCC-OT_IT];
> yuzhih...@gmail.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: coprocessor is timing out in 0.94
>
> ** **
>
> Regards, Saurabh.
