Re: Re: Poor performance of table Increment

I had the same issue. I ended up writing a coprocessor that did this under the BatchMutate hood using a special attribute in the Put operation, and that increased performance significantly to be almost equal to the regular batchMutate(Put) version. On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 7:59 AM, 陆巍

Re: Poor performance of table Increment

Note that you're doing single RPCs for each Increment. You should batch them (see HTable.batch(...)) What version of HBase? What's the ping time between the client and server machines?Is Nagle's disables (tcpnodelay set to true)? Otherwise each RPC will take at least 45 ms. Lastly you'll

Re: Poor performance of table Increment

Which release of hbase are you using ? Does it include HBASE-15213 ? Thanks On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, 陆巍 wrote: > Hi, > > I had a test for Increment operation, and find the performance is really > bad: 94809ms for 1000 increment operaions. > The testing cluster is