+
http://blog.sematext.com/2012/12/24/hbasewd-and-hbasehut-handy-hbase-libraries-available-in-public-maven-repo/
if you use Maven and want to use HBaseWD.
Otis
--
HBASE Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Amit Sela wrote:
> Hope I'm n
Hope I'm not too late here... regarding hot spotting with sequential keys,
I'd suggest you read this Sematext blog -
http://blog.sematext.com/2012/04/09/hbasewd-avoid-regionserver-hotspotting-despite-writing-records-with-sequential-keys/
They present a nice idea there for this kind of issues.
Good
bq. write performance would be lower
The above means poorer performance.
bq. I could batch them up application side
Please do that.
bq. I guess there is no way to turn that off?
That's right.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Kireet wrote:
>
>
>
> Thanks for the reply. "write performance wo
Thanks for the reply. "write performance would be lower" -> this means
better?
Also I think I used the wrong terminology regarding batching. I meant to
ask if it uses the client side write buffer. I would think not since the
append() method returns a Result. I could batch them up applicati
I assume you would select HBase 0.94.6.1 (the latest release) for this
project.
For #1, write performance would be lower if you choose to use Append (vs.
using Put).
bq. Can appends be batched by the client or do they execute immediately?
This depends on your use case. Take a look at the followin