Hello Oliver,
Thank you for the clarification. As Kevin also pointed out, I guess we will
just have to test compression in our environment.
Regards,
/David
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Oliver Meyn (GBIF) om...@gbif.org wrote:
Hi David,
I wrote that blog post and I know that Lars George
Hi David,
I wrote that blog post and I know that Lars George has much more experience
than me with tuning HBase, especially in different environments, so weight our
opinions accordingly. As he says, it will usually help, and the unusual
cases of lower spec'd hardware (that I did those tests
*BUMP*
Sorry,
/David
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 3:57 PM, David Koch ogd...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
Are scans faster when compression is activated? The HBase book by Lars
George seems to suggest so (p424, Section on Compression in chapter
Performance Tuning).
... compression usually
Dave,
I would recommend trying it in your environment. Like most tests you can
find other blogs that argue the performance is better:
http://blog.erdemagaoglu.com/post/4605524309/lzo-vs-snappy-vs-lzf-vs-zlib-a-comparison-of
It will depend on your environment, filesize, how well it
Hello,
Are scans faster when compression is activated? The HBase book by Lars
George seems to suggest so (p424, Section on Compression in chapter
Performance Tuning).
... compression usually will yield overall better performance, because the
overhead of the CPU performing the compression and de-
