Subject: Re: Upgrading 0.20.6 - 0.89
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Buttler, Davidbuttl...@llnl.gov wrote:
I currently suggest that you use the CDH3 hadoop package. Apparently
StumbleUpon has a production version of 0.89 that they are using. It would
be helpful if Cloudera put
PM, Buttler, David wrote:
Fantastic news, I look forward to it
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:t...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:25 AM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading 0.20.6 - 0.89
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:35 AM
, 2010 11:25 AM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading 0.20.6 - 0.89
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Buttler, Davidbuttl...@llnl.gov
wrote:
I currently suggest that you use the CDH3 hadoop package. Apparently
StumbleUpon has a production version of 0.89 that they are using
, Buttler, David wrote:
Fantastic news, I look forward to it
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:t...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:25 AM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading 0.20.6 - 0.89
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:35
We're using 0.20.6; we have a non-trivial application using many aspects
of hbase; we have a couple of customers in production; we understand this
is still pre-release, however we don't want to lose any data.
Will upgrading to 0.89 be a PITA?
Should we expect to be able to upgrade the
that they are using. It would be
helpful if Cloudera put that in their distribution.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Mark Laffoon [mailto:mlaff...@semanticresearch.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:00 AM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Upgrading 0.20.6 - 0.89
We're using 0.20.6; we
Will upgrading to 0.89 be a PITA?
Unless you still use the deprecated APIs, it's actually just a matter
of replacing the distribution and restarting.
Should we expect to be able to upgrade the servers without losing data?
Definitely, since no upgrade of the filesystem format is required. But
Just a quick question that often intrigues me, why do you guys prefer the
CDH3b2? and not a regular hadoop-0.20.X???
Thanks in advanced.
Renato M.
2010/9/28 Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.org
Will upgrading to 0.89 be a PITA?
Unless you still use the deprecated APIs, it's actually just
Somes patches that improve throughput for HBase, although you also
need a HBase-side patch (HBASE-2467). They also backported stuff from
0.21 that's never going to be in 0.20-append. That's our main reasons
to use CDh3b2.
J-D
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo
-0.20-append
but CDH3 offers other benefits, check out their blog.
Best regards,
- Andy
--- On Tue, 9/28/10, Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo renatoj.marroq...@gmail.com
wrote:
From: Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo renatoj.marroq...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Upgrading 0.20.6 - 0.89
To: user
renatoj.marroq...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Upgrading 0.20.6 - 0.89
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 10:02 AM
Just a quick question that often intrigues me, why do you guys
prefer the CDH3b2? and not a regular hadoop-0.20.X???
Thanks in advanced.
Renato M.
offers other benefits, check out their blog.
Best regards,
- Andy
--- On Tue, 9/28/10, Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo
renatoj.marroq...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo renatoj.marroq...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Upgrading 0.20.6 - 0.89
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Date
Fantastic news, I look forward to it
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:t...@cloudera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:25 AM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading 0.20.6 - 0.89
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Buttler, David buttl...@llnl.gov wrote
13 matches
Mail list logo
