@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2014 12:55 AM
Subject: Using HBase in standalone mode in production
Hi all,
So this question might be stupid, retarded even, but it has been bugging me
for a while and I cannot think of a better place to ask this. I am really
impressed with the way HBase
ze with flexibility of growing and shrinking.
>
>
> Artem Ervits
> Data Analyst
> New York Presbyterian Hospital
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Arun Allamsetty [mailto:arun.allamse...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 08:37 PM
> To: user@hbase.apache.o
Message -
From: Arun Allamsetty [mailto:arun.allamse...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 08:37 PM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using HBase in standalone mode in production
I have never tried MySQL's blob or varbinary. I guess I can look into that.
Thanks for answering my ques
I have never tried MySQL's blob or varbinary. I guess I can look into that.
Thanks for answering my questions.
Arun
On Jul 7, 2014 6:22 PM, "Dima Spivak" wrote:
> Does MySQL's BLOB or VARBINARY satisfy your use case?
>
> As for converting a pseudo-distributed cluster to a distributed one, unless
Does MySQL's BLOB or VARBINARY satisfy your use case?
As for converting a pseudo-distributed cluster to a distributed one, unless
I'm mistaken, you should have no problem doing so. HDFS is quite good with
scaling, whether it's from 10 machines to 20 or 1 to 10 and I don't know of
any reason that H
I understand. But for example, my use case is where even if I don't have a
lot of data, what if I would rather store serialized objects. For this
traditional RDBMS are not suitable. If I can forego the fail safe
capabilities, then what is a good choice (if not HBase).
Also, on a different note, if
In general, production systems run in distributed mode because they
leverage HBase's scalability and reliability; HBase really only shows its
worth when it's charged with managing terabytes of data on a fault-tolerant
file system like HDFS. You lose both of these when you run in standalone
mode, so
Hi Ted,
I have. So the book says there are two types of distributed modes. One is
pseudo distributed, which is used when we want to test HBase's distributed
capabilities using a single machine. As far as I understood, this is just
to verify the use cases and the requirements. Then we have the full
Have you read http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#standalone_dist ?
Cheers
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Arun Allamsetty
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So this question might be stupid, retarded even, but it has been bugging me
> for a while and I cannot think of a better place to ask this. I am really
Hi all,
So this question might be stupid, retarded even, but it has been bugging me
for a while and I cannot think of a better place to ask this. I am really
impressed with the way HBase works (as a key-value store). Since it stores
everything as a byte array, I find it really convenient to store
10 matches
Mail list logo
