Re: WAN HBase Replication

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
This is really a question of available bandwidth VS data size, not so much latency since replication is async. J-D On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Jeff Whiting wrote: > OK that makes sense with the vpn or p2p.  Will replication work over WAN > with the added latency, etc? > > ~Jeff > > On 10/4/2

Re: WAN HBase Replication

2011-10-04 Thread Jeff Whiting
OK that makes sense with the vpn or p2p. Will replication work over WAN with the added latency, etc? ~Jeff On 10/4/2011 3:10 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: Hey Jeff, Usually what people do is either setup a VPN between both datacenters or get a point-to-point connection. We're doing the forme

Re: WAN HBase Replication

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
Hey Jeff, Usually what people do is either setup a VPN between both datacenters or get a point-to-point connection. We're doing the former. J-D On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Jeff Whiting wrote: > We have 2 data centers (lets call them A and B), one on the west coast and > another on the east

WAN HBase Replication

2011-10-04 Thread Jeff Whiting
We have 2 data centers (lets call them A and B), one on the west coast and another on the east coast of the US. We would like to replicated data between them using HBase replication. However it looks like each region server in A has to be able to talk to each region server in B as well as have