I would think that a single BM ought to perform well over time, although
I'd be interested in hearing otherwise.
FWIW, BM's criteria for sending batch requests is more about size of the
puts rather than the number of puts.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Artem Ervits wrote:
> Thanks Enis, woul
Thanks Enis, would you say creating a new BM every 10k rows vs reusing the
same BM would make any difference in performance?
On Oct 28, 2015 2:54 PM, "Enis Söztutar" wrote:
> Hi Artem,
>
> The 1.0 API BufferedMutator should cover the use case where previously
> HTableUtil was used or HTable.setAu
Hi Artem,
The 1.0 API BufferedMutator should cover the use case where previously
HTableUtil was used or HTable.setAutoFlush(false) is used.
BufferedMutator already groups the mutations per region server under the
hood (AsyncProcess) and sends the buffered mutations in the background.
There should
Hello all,
is there an equivalent utility in HBase 1.0+ to HTableUtil? I'd like to
batch mutations by region server.
Thanks