On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Ryan Rawson wrote:
> The flaws with the paper are insanely obvious if you look at them:
>
> - their solution doesn't run on disk. Many things get faster when you
> restrict yourself to RAM/flash
> - their solution doesn't scale! Looks like a shared nothing shardin
The flaws with the paper are insanely obvious if you look at them:
- their solution doesn't run on disk. Many things get faster when you
restrict yourself to RAM/flash
- their solution doesn't scale! Looks like a shared nothing sharding
with global transaction ordering and no internal locks.
Or
I've tried to post the below comment twice at
The problems with ACID, and how to fix them without going NoSQL
http://dbmsmusings.blogspot.com/2010/08/problems-with-acid-and-how-to-fix-them.html
For whatever reason, it has appeared in the comments section from my
perspective briefly twi
