Thanks kulkarni,
WIll check the same and reply back ASAP.
Regards,
Vijay Raajaa G S
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:27 AM, kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com <
kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. It is possible to do that. The attached patch on the bug adds in a
> new HBaseCompositeKey class that c
Hi Mark,
I'm using single node Hive installation with all settings default. Yes, the
table is partitioned on the column comp_code.
Regards,
Omkar Joshi
From: Mark Wagner [mailto:wagner.mar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 11:15 PM
To: user@hive.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hive index er
If the join is a reduce side join,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2206 will optimize this query
and generate a single MR job. The optimizer introduced by HIVE-2206 is in
trunk. Currently, it only handles the same column(s).
If the join is a MapJoin, hive 0.11 can generate a single MR j
Thanks Venki.. This is exactly the issue I am facing..
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Venki Korukanti
wrote:
> Looks like there is already a JIRA for this:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-4693. It repros in Hive 0.11
> too.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Chandraprakash Bhag
Hi
Hive version 0.9.0 (hive-common-0.9.0-cdh4.1.2.jar)
hive.security.authorization.enabled
true
enable or disable the hive client authorization
Linux User = hiveuser1 (no hive permissions)
CASE 1
hive -e "select * from outpdir_ptitle_explanation_parsed limit 10"
Authorization failed:
yeah.i agree. that doesn't make any sense. why in the world would the
"where clause" not be supported with that syntax? something's rotten in
denmark there with your query.
what version of hive are you seeing this on?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Sha Liu wrote:
> Doesn't INSERT INTO do
and what version of hive are you running your test on? i do believe - not
certain - that hive 0.11 includes the optimization you seek.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Chen Song wrote:
> Suppose we have 2 simple tables
>
> A
> id int
> value string
>
> B
> id
>
> When hive translates the follo
http://julingks.tistory.com/category/Hive
Thanks
sanjay
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
==
This email message and any attachments are for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure
Looks like there is already a JIRA for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-4693. It repros in Hive 0.11 too.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Chandraprakash Bhagtani <
cpbhagt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I got some clue on this.. Actually I was running a patched hive, so it was
> eating u
Hi Omkar,
What Serde does the table use? Given that you're able to index on leg_id it
doesn't sound quite the same as the issue I hit. Is there any partitioning
of the table?
-Mark
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Omkar Joshi
wrote:
> I'm facing issues while building an index on multiple col
Suppose we have 2 simple tables
A
id int
value string
B
id
When hive translates the following query
select max(A.value), A.id from A join B on A.id = A.id group by A.id;
It launches 2 stages, one for the join and one for the group by.
My understanding is that if the join key set is a sub set
Hi Yin:
Thanks for the patch, I patch it and pass this testcase, I will use it with our
hive11 production test.
在 2013年8月1日星期四,上午5:09,Yin Huai 写道:
> I just uploaded a patch to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-4968.
> You can try it and see if the problem has been resolved for you
I got some clue on this.. Actually I was running a patched hive, so it was
eating up the exception. When i reverted the patch, i see the following
exception in either case (query1 and query2)
ava.io.FileNotFoundException: File
hdfs://mycluster/tmp/hive-training/hive_2013-08-01_03-24-07_554_3719658
Hi,
I was facing a weird issue with hive today. I ran the following 2 queries
query1: select co.city from company1 co inner join customer1 cu on
(co.city=cu.city);
query2: select distinct co.city from company1 co inner join customer1 cu
on (co.city=cu.city);
the difference in both these que
14 matches
Mail list logo