Thanks for the response.
Cheers!
On Mar 19, 2012, at 16:42 , Maxime Brugidou wrote:
> From my experience, if you can fit data in a SQL without sharding or
> anything, don't ever think twice. Hive is not even comparable.
_
>From my experience, if you can fit data in a SQL without sharding or
anything, don't ever think twice. Hive is not even comparable.
I would rather say that Hive is a nice SQL interface over Hadoop M/R rather
than any SQL replacement. If you are running a DWH in SQL and you don't
need to grow your
I haven't had an opportunity to set up a huge Hive database yet because
exporting csv files from our SQL database is, in itself, a rather laborious
task. I was just curious how I might expect Hive to perform vs. SQL on large
databases and large queries? I realize Hive is pretty "latent" since
