Please ensure hive.stats.autogather is enabled as well.
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023, 2:57 PM Denys Kuzmenko wrote:
> `hive.iceberg.stats.source` controls where the stats should be sourced
> from. When it's set to iceberg (default), we should go directly to iceberg
> and bypass HMS.
>
`hive.iceberg.stats.source` controls where the stats should be sourced from.
When it's set to iceberg (default), we should go directly to iceberg and bypass
HMS.
this location_based_table table in hive. Does it also launch the tez
task to scan table?
Thanks,
Butao Zhang
Replied Message
| From | lisoda |
| Date | 11/9/2023 15:50 |
| To | |
| Subject | Re:Re: Re: Hive's performance for querying the Iceberg table is
very poor. |
STEP1:
CREATE TABLE US
3-11-09 15:36:50，"Butao Zhang" 写道：
Could you please provide detailed steps to reproduce this issue? e.g. how do
you create the table?
Thanks,
Butao Zhang
Replied Message
| From | lisoda |
| Date | 11/9/2023 14:25 |
| To | |
| Subject | Re:Re: Re: Hive's performance for
Could you please provide detailed steps to reproduce this issue? e.g. how do
you create the table?
Thanks,
Butao Zhang
Replied Message
| From | lisoda |
| Date | 11/9/2023 14:25 |
| To | |
| Subject | Re:Re: Re: Hive's performance for querying the Iceberg table is
very
x27;t take effect if having delete
files.
Thanks,
Butao Zhang
Replied Message
| From | lisoda |
| Date | 11/9/2023 10:43 |
| To | |
| Subject | Re:Re: Re: Hive's performance for querying the Iceberg table is
very poor. |
HI.
I am testing with HIVE-4.0.0-BETA
10:43 |
| To | |
| Subject | Re:Re: Re: Hive's performance for querying the Iceberg table is
very poor. |
HI.
I am testing with HIVE-4.0.0-BETA-1 version and I am using location_based_table.
So far I found that HIVE still can't push some queries down to METADATA, e.g.
COUNT(*).
Is HI
g to use starrocks.
mpp architecture databases have natural limitations, and starrocks does not
necessarily perform better than hive llap.
Replied Message
| From | Albert Wong |
| Date | 10/24/2023 01:39 |
| To | user@hive.apache.org |
| Cc | |
| Subject | Re: Hive's performance
tarrocks does
>>> not necessarily perform better than hive llap.
>>>
>>>
>>> Replied Message
>>> From Albert Wong
>>> Date 10/24/2023 01:39
>>> To user@hive.apache.org
>>> Cc
>>> Subject Re: Hive's perfor
Message
>> From Albert Wong
>> Date 10/24/2023 01:39
>> To user@hive.apache.org
>> Cc
>> Subject Re: Hive's performance for querying the Iceberg table is very
>> poor.
>> I would try http://starrocks.io. StarRocks is an MPP OLAP database
&
cks.
> mpp architecture databases have natural limitations, and starrocks does
> not necessarily perform better than hive llap.
>
>
> Replied Message
> From Albert Wong
> Date 10/24/2023 01:39
> To user@hive.apache.org
> Cc
> Subject Re: Hive's performance
x27;s performance for querying the Iceberg table is very poor.
|
I would try http://starrocks.io. StarRocks is an MPP OLAP database that can
query Apache Iceberg and we can cache the data for faster performance. We also
have additional features like building materialized views that span a
I would try http://starrocks.io. StarRocks is an MPP OLAP database that
can query Apache Iceberg and we can cache the data for faster performance.
We also have additional features like building materialized views that span
across Apache Iceberg, Apache Hudi and Apache Hive. Here is a video of
c
13 matches
Mail list logo
