Re: Ignite Web Console Docker Image not working

2018-02-05 Thread Roman Guseinov
Hello @frankie, Guess I faced the same issue when was trying to mount a directory on Windows host. Are you using Windows too? Can you please provide some logs using the way which @Vasiliy Sisko proposed. As I know, mounting volumes from a Windows directory is done using by SMB. This way mongodb m

Re: slow query performance against berkley db

2018-02-05 Thread Rajesh Kishore
Hi Michael Pls find my response Does that mean Ignite cannot scale well against Berkley dB Incase of single node? Could you please clarify, what your question means? (Rajesh) Our application currently uses Berkley dB and we are using it as key value dB ie storing object as value as bytes, we a

Re: Design help implementing custom counters on ignite

2018-02-05 Thread Michael Cherkasov
Hi Mansoor, in general, there're two approaches: 1. get data to a client, update and send it back 2. send code to data and make the update there Both can work, which one is faster depends on your case, it depends on data model size, backup count, your network speed. So this is something that you

Re: slow query performance against berkley db

2018-02-05 Thread Michael Cherkasov
Rajesh, >Does that mean Ignite cannot scale well against Berkley dB Incase of single node? Could you please clarify, what your question means? Ignite can scale from a single node to hundreds(or even thousands, I have seen the only cluster of 300 nodes, but this definitely not a limit). It was des

Re: slow query performance against berkley db

2018-02-05 Thread Rajesh Kishore
Any pointers please Thanks Rajesh On 5 Feb 2018 10:53 p.m., "Rajesh Kishore" wrote: > Hi Christos > > Does that mean Ignite cannot scale well against Berkley dB Incase of > single node? > > Regards > Rajesh > > On 5 Feb 2018 10:08 p.m., "Christos Erotocritou" > wrote: > >> Hi Rajesh, >> >> Ign

Re: Peer to peer class loading + deployment modes

2018-02-05 Thread Michael Cherkasov
Hi Luqman, you're right, peer class loading is exactly what you need, isolated or shared mode fit your case and will automatically deploy a new compute classes, but unfortunately, there's no way to enable peer class loading without cluster restart. So you need to plan a maintenance for your cluste

Design help implementing custom counters on ignite

2018-02-05 Thread M Mansur Ashraf
Hey guys, I am new to Ignite and trying to implement a custom counter. I read the document and it seems like I can implement my counter in three different ways so need some help figuring out which approach to take. //business logic in pseudo code Ignite ignite = Ignition.ignite(); IgniteTransact

Design help implementing custom counter on ignite

2018-02-05 Thread Mansur.Ashraf
Hey guys, I am new to Ignite and trying to implement a custom counter. I read the document and it seems like I can implement my counter in three different ways so need some help figuring out which approach to take. //business logic in pseudo code Ignite ignite = Ignition.ignite(); IgniteTransact

Re: Moving directories

2018-02-05 Thread Jonathan Kelly
Val, Yes, that definitely makes sense regarding not being able to move a directory into one of its descendants. However, it's not just that the example is wrong but also these sentences: You are free to rename/move data files as you wish, but directories can be only renamed. You cannot move the

Re: slow query performance against berkley db

2018-02-05 Thread Rajesh Kishore
Hi Christos Does that mean Ignite cannot scale well against Berkley dB Incase of single node? Regards Rajesh On 5 Feb 2018 10:08 p.m., "Christos Erotocritou" wrote: > Hi Rajesh, > > Ignite is a distributed system, testing with one node is really not the > way. > > You need to consider having m

Re: slow query performance against berkley db

2018-02-05 Thread Christos Erotocritou
Hi Rajesh, Ignite is a distributed system, testing with one node is really not the way. You need to consider having multiple nodes and portion and collocate your data before. Thanks, C > On 5 Feb 2018, at 16:36, Rajesh Kishore wrote: > > Hi, > > We are in the process of evaluating Ignite na

slow query performance against berkley db

2018-02-05 Thread Rajesh Kishore
Hi, We are in the process of evaluating Ignite native persistence against berkely db. For some reason Ignite query does not seem to be performant the way application code behaves against berkley db Background: Berkley db - As of now, we have berkley db for our application and the data is stored a

Re: Upgrading from Ignite-2.1 to Ignite-2.3

2018-02-05 Thread Evgenii Zhuravlev
Sorry, it was a mistake in my previous answer, I meant that you should stop all nodes of version 2.1 at first. Evgenii 2018-02-05 17:35 GMT+03:00 Evgenii Zhuravlev : > Hi, > > You witnessed his issue because you have node of the previous version in > the cluster on the address abcd-lapp0003.mgmt

Re: Upgrading from Ignite-2.1 to Ignite-2.3

2018-02-05 Thread Evgenii Zhuravlev
Hi, You witnessed his issue because you have node of the previous version in the cluster on the address abcd-lapp0003.mgmt..org/xx.xx.21.26. You should start all nodes of version 2.1 at first and then start nodes with a new version. Evgenii 2018-02-05 17:31 GMT+03:00 aMark : > Hi > > > We a

Upgrading from Ignite-2.1 to Ignite-2.3

2018-02-05 Thread aMark
Hi We are using Ignite cache version 2.1. We are using it as persistent store in Partitioned Mode having 6 data node running. Atomicity mode is ATOMIC, and Rebalance mode is ASYNC while CacheWriteSynchronizationMode is FULL_SYNC. We are upgrading the env to latest Ignite version 2.3. As we a

How to identify stale ignite client in case of data grid restart and auto reconnect to cluster

2018-02-05 Thread aMark
Hi, We are using Ignite cache version 2.1 . We are using it as persistent store in Partitioned Mode having 6 data node running. Atomicity mode is ATOMIC, and Rebalance mode is ASYNC while CacheWriteSynchronizationMode is FULL_SYNC. We have ignite client which does read/write to ignite data gri

Peer to peer class loading + deployment modes

2018-02-05 Thread luqmanahmad
Hi there, We have several hundred ignite server nodes and few clients which are loading classes to ignite on demand. Now from time to time we need to redeploy the client with some new changes, which could include changes in the classes which are already loaded to ignite worker nodes through ignite

Re: Get TTL of the specific (K,V) entry

2018-02-05 Thread Dmitry Pavlov
Hi, Previously, in real applications, I needed such information about what is the remaining lifetime for the object (at least for debug and monitoring). So I am also +1 for providing such information in the API. Otherwise, user have to duplicate this information in an entry field. Sincerely, Dmi