Guys, is there any solution for this?
Can someone please respond?
Thanks,
Prasad
-- Forwarded message -
From: Prasad Bhalerao
Date: Fri, Sep 7, 2018, 8:04 AM
Subject: Fwd: Query execution too long even after providing index
To:
Can we have update on this?
-- Forwarde
Prem -
Thank for your reply.
You explained why Ignite container grew from 2.5G to more than 4G because
there is 2G heap memory and more than 2G off-heap memory, I think what you
said is very correct and solve one of my main problems.
But another question, why system memory cache also grows s
Thank you Ilya, I found that I increased this timeout on server side but not
on client side, i guess this should be the problem, it should be the client
who closed the connection.
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
With writeThrough an entry in the cache will never be "dirty" in that sense -
cache store will update the backing DB at the same time the cache update
happens.
From: monstereo
Sent: 14 августа 2018 г. 22:39
To: user@ignite.apache.org
Subject: Re: Eviction Policy on Dirty data
yes, using cachest
Hi Mridul,
Have you considered the option of creating a dedicated Threadpool for the
cache store operations. Here is an example
http://commons.apache.org/dormant/threadpool/
Another option would be to consider Hystrix Command Threadpool since you
mentioned that the cache store is remote web serv