Ignite 2.7.6: Memory Leak with Direct buffers in TCPCommunication SPI

2020-02-25 Thread Mahesh Renduchintala
Hi, We have been searching for a cause of memory leak in ignite server nodes for many weeks now. The memory leak exists and below is the scenario. Scenario * Scenario * Our ignite servers have about 50GB of data. Two servers were baselined * There are about 10 client nodes con

Re: TEST mail

2020-02-25 Thread Denis Magda
Who are you trying to share in the body? Attaching smth? Try to stick to the plain text. - Denis On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:35 AM Prasad Bhalerao < prasadbhalerao1...@gmail.com> wrote: > my mails with body contents are not showing up in ignite user list. Sent > the same mail multiple times but n

Re: Read through not working as expected in case of Replicated cache

2020-02-25 Thread Denis Magda
Ignite Dev team, This sounds like an issue in our replicated cache implementation rather than an expected behavior. Especially, if partitioned caches don't have such a specificity. Who can explain why write-through needs to be enabled for replicated caches to reload an entry from an underlying da

Re: NodeOrder in GridCacheVersion

2020-02-25 Thread Prasad Bhalerao
Hi, > Ignite Version: 2.6 > No of nodes: 4 > > I am getting following exception while committing transaction. > > Although I just reading the value from this cache inside transaction and I > am sure that the cache and "cache entry" read is not being modified out > this transaction on any other no

NodeOrder in GridCacheVersion

2020-02-25 Thread Prasad Bhalerao
Hi, 1) What is nodeOrder in grid cache version? 2) When does it change? 3) How does it affect transaction? I think my transaction is failing due to this change in nodeorder. GridCacheVersion [topVer=194120123, order=4, nodeOrder=2] Thanks, Prasad

Re: TEST mail

2020-02-25 Thread Prasad Bhalerao
my mails with body contents are not showing up in ignite user list. Sent the same mail multiple times but no luck. Anyone knows the issue? On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:45 PM Rick Alexander wrote: > Test MAIL reply > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 12:00 PM Prasad Bhalerao < > prasadbhalerao1...@gmail.com>

Re: TEST mail

2020-02-25 Thread Rick Alexander
Test MAIL reply On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 12:00 PM Prasad Bhalerao wrote: > >

TEST mail

2020-02-25 Thread Prasad Bhalerao

Re: ERROR: h2 Unsupported connection setting "MULTI_THREADED"

2020-02-25 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! I recommend tweaking your dependency importing to make sure you exclude all H2 versions but the one needed by Apache Ignite. With Maven, mvn dependency:tree to the rescue. H2 is currently the heart of Ignite's SQL and, as such, it is not negotiable. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev вт, 25

Re: Long running query

2020-02-25 Thread Vladimir Pligin
Hi, The most useful information here is the plan that the RDBMS uses. Is it possible to share it? I suppose that using of either the IDX_ORG_MEDP_DRUG index or the IDX_DRUG_ID index is not absolutely correct. My bet is an index on (DRUG_ID, ORG_ID) could help here but it's to be checked. And it'

Re: ERROR: h2 Unsupported connection setting "MULTI_THREADED"

2020-02-25 Thread Andrew Munn
Yes I'm using spring boot. Can Ignite be updated to work with the latest h2? On Fri, Feb 21, 2020, 6:25 AM Ilya Kasnacheev wrote: > Hello! > > I've heard about issues with e.g. Spring Boot overriding h2 database > version and breaking our runtime. I'm not sure who else does that. > > Regards, >

Re: Read through not working as expected in case of Replicated cache

2020-02-25 Thread Ilya Kasnacheev
Hello! I think this is by design. You may suggest edits on readme.io. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пн, 24 февр. 2020 г. в 17:28, Prasad Bhalerao : > Hi, > > Is this a bug or the cache is designed to work this way? > > If it is as-designed, can this behavior be updated in ignite documentation?

RE: Re: Sequence with ODBC

2020-02-25 Thread Abhay Gupta
Can you pls suggest some alternate way of generating the same in the application which Is good for Primary Key like UUID where the issue is that it is 128bit . Regards, Abhay Gupta From: Igor SapegoSent: 25 February 2020 17:37To: userSubject: Re: Sequence with ODBC There is no such option currently

Re: Sequence with ODBC

2020-02-25 Thread Igor Sapego
There is no such option currently, AFAIK Best Regards, Igor On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 3:02 PM Abhay Gupta wrote: > Hi , > > > > Do we have a way to have Autoincrement field in Database for use in Thin > Client / UNIX ODBC . The Atomic sequence help is available with Java when > JAVA ignite is us

Sequence with ODBC

2020-02-25 Thread Abhay Gupta
Hi , Do we have a way to have Autoincrement field in Database for use in Thin Client / UNIX ODBC . The Atomic sequence help is available with Java when JAVA ignite is used but it does not tell if the same is available through thin client protocol or not . Regards, Abhay Gupta 

Re: Is Apache ignite support tiering or it only support caching??

2020-02-25 Thread Stephen Darlington
Ignite supports persistence to disk. It’s configured using data regions. So you could have one data region that’s entirely in memory and another that’s on disk. We don’t call them “tiers” but that’s effectively what they allow. > On 25 Feb 2020, at 05:57, Preet wrote: > > I am new to ignit

Re: How to access IGFS file written one node from other node in cluster ??

2020-02-25 Thread aealexsandrov
As was mentioned above IGFS was deprecated and not recommended for use. Just use native HDFS API for working with files: https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/api/org/apache/hadoop/fs/FileSystem.html In case if you have some SQL over HDFS (Hive, Impala) then you can set up the Ignite cache stor

Re: ClusterTopologyServerNotFoundException

2020-02-25 Thread prudhvibiruda
Hi, Even I am getting the same exception with cachemode.replicated. But my requirement is that my ignite node shouldn't wait for other nodes in the cluster. In our case , even when one node is down , the other should be working.So that's why we didn't define the baseline topology. Can you give an