I'm seeing our integration tests hang. The cause is something in
Random2LruPageEvictionTracker, i'm able to reproduce this 100% of time on
many different laptops and in our ci/cd. I was able to work around this by
disabling PageEviction in our Default Data Region during the tests. I don't
see th
Dear Community,
I have uploaded a release candidate of the two extension modules
`ignite-spring-boot-autoconfigure` and
`ignite-spring-boot-client-autoconfigure`.
The following staging can be used for testing:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheignite-1478/
Tag with na
Hello!
Your understanding is correct.
Yes, if you have more RAM and larger data region, the process should slow
down less rapidly.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
пн, 27 апр. 2020 г. в 17:56, Shubham Agrawal :
> Hi Ilya,
>
> This data loading is not a one time activity for our scenario. So, I gu
Hi Ilya,
This data loading is not a one time activity for our scenario. So, I guess
turning off the WAL would not be a solution since turning off and on every
time is not feasible every time the data loading happens. Please let me
know if my understanding is correct.
I'll try to increase time bet
Hello!
My recommendation is to increase time between checkpoints
(checkpointFrequency) and, maybe, also increase checkpoint page buffer.
If you do data loading in bursts, it may make sense to turn off WAL why you
do data loading.
You may still expect some data degradation as time goes on (what's
Hi Ilya,
thnx for replay, I think that Ignite CURRENT_TIMESTAMP() is NOT TIMESTAMP
WITH TIME ZONE.
Below it test with inserting CURRENT_TIMESTAMP in two tables, one with data
type TIMESTAMP and second with TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE.
First of all,
in Ignite documentation I can't find that CURRENT
Hello!
In Ignite, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP() is TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
вс, 26 апр. 2020 г. в 14:51, dbutkovic :
> Hi Ilya,
>
> thanks a lot for the reply,
> it is surprising that EPOCH is not always the same regardless of the
> timezone.
> I did a test on two Ignite i
Hi, Could you share about "partition awareness" detail information?
like, example link.
And you said Ignite thin client on startup select's random server to
connect available address.
This selection(connect to server node) is not going to be change before
server node is shut down?? or my applica
yes, i mean same disk.
oh.. I see. Thank you so much for help
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hi Prasad,
Any update on this? I have a similar use case when I have to load 10million
of records from a mysql database table but I keep getting the error
"(jvm-pause-detector-worker) Possible too long JVM pause" even ignite
persistence is enabled (which should write in disk the data when the d
What do you mean by “I wrote a path and it worked at same machine”? Do you
mean that it’s a local disk? TcpDiscoverySharedFsIpFinder is designed to work
with a shared filesystem, i.e., all four of your nodes mount the same disk.
> On 27 Apr 2020, at 09:55, kay wrote:
>
> yes, I wrote a path
yes, I wrote a path and it worked at same machine(it means same IP).
My question is how can i set *different machine*(different IP,).
For example)
I have 4 node
--> machine 1 IP list
41.1.122.122:12200-> a
41.1.122.122:12202-> b
- machine 2 IP list
41.1.122.123:12200-> c
41.1.
The path is defined with the path parameter:
...
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/tcpip-discovery
> On 27 Apr 2020, at 08:44, kay wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to start 4 node at each different machine.
> Is is possible for us
Multicast generally only works on the same subnet, so I don’t think that’s
going to work. The next most obvious solution would be to use a static list, as
Evgenii said. If you don’t want to do that, you’re left with options like the
JDBC or Shared File System IP finder
(https://apacheignite.rea
I'd like to keep their IP dynamically managed that's why I use the TCP/IP
discovery but you have to provide a multicast adress. My issue is that I
don't know which one to use
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hello,
I'd like to start 4 node at each different machine.
Is is possible for use TcpDiscoverySharedFsIpFinder for node clustering??
I figured out it was working with in same machine.
but I'm wondering about different machine 'TcpDiscoverySharedFsIpFinder' .
if it is possible how can i set the
16 matches
Mail list logo
