Re: Apache Ignite 2.8.0: Node Metrics System View doesn't exist

Nikolay, could you please join the thread? Probably, that's a known limitation that should be addressed soon. - Denis On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 3:42 AM ivan.fedorenkov wrote: > Hello! > > According to documentation > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/system-views ignite should expose the >

Re: unsubscribe

Hi Gordon, You need to send an email to user-unsubscr...@ignite.apache.org to unsubscribe. Btw, did Ignite work out for your use case or you found a better solution? Just curios. - Denis On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 3:29 PM Gordon Reid (Nine Mile) < gordon.r...@ninemilefinancial.com> wrote: >

unsubscribe

unsubscribe This email and any attachments are proprietary & confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individuals to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely for those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nine Mile Financial Pty.

Re: Continuous query setPageSize and setTimeInterval question

You are correct. Your local reciever will get an update every 100 entries. setPageSize sets the number of entries to batch together before sending. When the server has accumulated a number of entries larger than getPageSize it sends a message to the receiver. Like I mentioned before,

Re: Random2LruPageEvictionTracker causing hanging in our integration tests

Hi Anton,Just to be clear, the stack trace is from a thread dump that I took while the process was hanging indefinitely. Although I can reproduce this easily in my service, I can't share the code with you. I'll attempt to get a generic use case to hang in this manner and post it to github. The

Re: Ignite Data loss

Hi, Please attach full logs from all nodes for investigation. ср, 29 апр. 2020 г. в 06:48, krkumar24061...@gmail.com < krkumar24061...@gmail.com>: > Checked the logs and nothing like that happened where went down. > > Thanx and Regards, > KR Kumar > > > > -- > Sent from:

Re: Ignite Data loss

Checked the logs and nothing like that happened where went down. Thanx and Regards, KR Kumar -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/

Re: There is a bug in the ValidationOnNodeJoinUtils class

Can you open a ticket? You’ve clearly done a lot of work here already. Do you have a reproducer, or a patch even? > On 29 Apr 2020, at 09:52, hulitao198758 wrote: > > The validation class ValidationOnNodeJoinUtils has been added. It does not > matter if the write cache is not configured. After

There is a bug in the ValidationOnNodeJoinUtils class

The validation class ValidationOnNodeJoinUtils has been added. It does not matter if the write cache is not configured. After the cache is configured in the cache, it will verify ctx.discovery (). CacheAffinityNode (ctx.discovery (). LocalNode (), cc. getName () this method, ctx.discovery ().

Re: Regarding EVT_NODE_SEGMENTED event

Thanks Ilya, Let me try. regards Veena. -- Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/