I found my mistake, it was indeed a glitch in the deployment yaml as I forgot
to specify the service account.
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hi Guru,
we met an exception on below, it impacts system no responses, any
suggestions how to identify the case?
12:18:10,035 [grid-timeout-worker-#39] WARN
org.apache.ignite.internal.diagnostic - First 10 long running cache futures
[total=1]
12:18:10,035 [grid-timeout-worker-#39] WARN
org.a
Hello!
By putting your affinity column in the public key of all tables and issuing
WITH "affinity_key=" clause when creating table.
Please also see https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/affinity-collocation
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 18:32, Surkov.Aleksandr :
> There is
Hello!
With persistence, you will probably burn through the burst time (in-memory
no-checkpoint) faster and hit the "slow" persistent epoch earlier.
Then you will need to tune your persistence.
Please see https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/durable-memory-tuning
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
п
Hello!
Maybe there's something with your filter implementation which prevents it
from functioning.
Can you throw together a small reproducer project to show this behavior?
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
пт, 10 июл. 2020 г. в 19:35, VeenaMithare :
> Hi Ilya,
>
> Yes, So filter gets created but n
Hello!
I recommend setting it somewhat lower, but longer than any of your expected
GC pauses. 30s is OK.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
вс, 12 июл. 2020 г. в 14:03, Kamlesh Joshi :
> Thanks for the findings Ilya.
>
>
>
> So shall we set the same timeout value for *socketWriteTimeout* as that
> o
Hello!
This means a cache operation takes longer to complete than usual, mostly
due to locking, node network unavailability, checkpoint, etc...
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
пн, 13 июл. 2020 г. в 09:20, marble.zh...@coinflex.com <
marble.zh...@coinflex.com>:
> Hi Guru,
>
> we met an exception o
HI Ilya,
I will put together something and post it here.
regards,
Veena.
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>From what i have read so far, seems like if i have 2 caches each to be
configured with 50MB, then i need to define 2 identical regions with unique
names and apply to each of the caches.
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hi I want to get how many entries are on the thick client's near cache. Is
there a way?
thanks, are there any hints that can find/locate the operations that impact
the server?
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
11 matches
Mail list logo