Re[2]: Questions related to check pointing

2020-12-29 Thread Zhenya Stanilovsky
Don`t think so, checkpointing work perfectly well already before this fix. Need additional info for start digging your problem, can you share ignite logs somewhere?   >I noticed an entry in the Ignite 2.9.1 changelog: >* Improved checkpoint concurrent behaviour >I am having trouble finding the

Re: Ignite in-memory + other SQL store without fully loading all data into Ignite

2020-12-29 Thread Courtney Robinson
Hey Denis, It's been a while. Hope you've been keeping well! A meet the second week of Jan will be great. The agenda looks good too. We've been watching the calcite SQL engine wiki and task list

Re: Questions related to check pointing

2020-12-29 Thread Raymond Wilson
I noticed an entry in the Ignite 2.9.1 changelog: - Improved checkpoint concurrent behaviour I am having trouble finding the relevant Jira ticket for this in the 2.9.1 Jira area at

Re: Ignite in-memory + other SQL store without fully loading all data into Ignite

2020-12-29 Thread Denis Magda
Hi Courtney, Glad to hear from you! It's been a while since we met last time. It's truly disappointing seeing you struggle with Ignite that much. Thanks for being open and kicking the discussion off. How about three of us (you, Val, and I) meet the second week of January and talk out the issues?

Re: Ignite thread pools

2020-12-29 Thread Raymond Wilson
Thanks Nikita! :) Sent from my iPhone On 30/12/2020, at 2:41 AM, Никита Сафонов wrote:  Hi Raymond, Thanks for the feedback! I'll extend the documentation. I've already created a ticket for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13932 Regards, Nikita пн, 28 дек. 2020 г. в

Re: Ignite thread pools

2020-12-29 Thread Никита Сафонов
Hi Raymond, Thanks for the feedback! I'll extend the documentation. I've already created a ticket for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13932 Regards, Nikita пн, 28 дек. 2020 г. в 08:33, Raymond Wilson : > Hi, > > I have been drilling into some of the Ignite thread pool

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Ignite 2.9.1 Released

2020-12-29 Thread Yaroslav Molochkov
The Apache Ignite Community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Ignite 2.9.1. Apache Ignite [1] is a memory-centric distributed database, caching and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale. This release

Re: Is Model class OR a value object mandatory for inserting the data thru non SQL API

2020-12-29 Thread Naveen
I just created the cache by running the below SQL from SQLLine console CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS TEST_STATS_NAVEEN_NO_VAL ( stats_id VARCHAR, testname VARCHAR, testcityId VARCHAR, PRIMARY KEY (stats_id)) WITH "template=myCacheTemplate,

Re: Is Model class OR a value object mandatory for inserting the data thru non SQL API

2020-12-29 Thread Pavel Tupitsyn
How do you configure the cache? QueryEntity.valueType should be the same string as you use in ignite.binary().builder() On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 11:08 AM Naveen wrote: > This way if we insert > > gnite.binary().builder("ANY_STRING_HERE"); > builder.setField("id", 1); > builder.setField("name",

Re: Is Model class OR a value object mandatory for inserting the data thru non SQL API

2020-12-29 Thread Naveen
This way if we insert gnite.binary().builder("ANY_STRING_HERE"); builder.setField("id", 1); builder.setField("name", "John"); We wont be able to retrieve the data thru SQL API. I did the same, but I dont see the records which I inserted thru Binary API by using the above. We get this error