Thanks for your answer. For the moment, the workaround I use is that I created
a task in Java that does the "Get" part for the C++ client (but this is less
efficient as it causes deserialization).
I might try your workaround.
De : Igor Sapego
Envoyé : mercredi 31
Well, the quick work around would be to add at least one named field to the
object.
Meanwhile, we'll try to figure out the right way to fix it without breaking
backward compatibility.
Best Regards,
Igor
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 10:46 AM Louis C wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your answers. Igor,
