to be reproduced (check the code on IGNITE-7319 if it is looks like
> your case), provide some logs and thread dumps to analyze.
>
> Regards,
> Anton
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Develop
My ignite version is 1.9
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:32 AM Alper Tekinalp wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> We have such a use case that we regularly create and destroy caches on run
> time. But when we destroy a cache accesses to other caches could be blocked
> and our worker threads not proc
comments?
Regards.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Development Team Lead
Evam Streaming Analytics
www.evam.com <http://www.evam.com.tr>
<http://www.evam.com>
Hi.
No, I did not try to increase the data region. But as you also specified
that will not fix the current problem I guess.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Development Team Lead
Evam Streaming Analytics
www.evam.com <http://www.evam.com.tr>
<http://www.evam.com>
gards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> вт, 23 окт. 2018 г. в 13:40, Alper Tekinalp :
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Actually they are not same records.
>>
>> Run code on java 1.8.0_111 on a MacBook Pro.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 1:31 PM Alper Tekinalp
Also my Ignite version is 2.6.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:02 PM Alper Tekinalp wrote:
> Hi.
>
> After running more than an hour, the results are as in the attached file.
> It seems to growing constantly.
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 2:31 PM Ilya Kasnacheev
> wrote:
>
>
Hi.
Actually they are not same records.
Run code on java 1.8.0_111 on a MacBook Pro.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 1:31 PM Alper Tekinalp wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have a code attached. Basically I keep adding and deleting same records
> to/from cache. But getTotalAllocatedSize from DataR
Hi all.
I have a code attached. Basically I keep adding and deleting same records
to/from cache. But getTotalAllocatedSize from DataRegionMetrics seems to
keep growing.
Are there any comments?
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Development Team Lead
Evam Streaming Analytics
www.evam.com <h
ce that we only keep certain record on memory?
Do you have any suggestions that perform better in our use case?
Thanks a lot. Best regards.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Development Team Lead
Evam Streaming Analytics
www.evam.com <http://www.evam.com.tr>
<http://www.evam.com>
te-through
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Development Team Lead
Evam Streaming Analytics
www.evam.com <http://www.evam.com.tr>
<http://www.evam.com>
.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Development Team Lead
Evam Streaming Analytics
www.evam.com <http://www.evam.com.tr>
<http://www.evam.com>
745)
We encounter that log time to time specially when loading big partitioned
caches across the cluster. What does stripes threads do? Is there a way to
avoid that?
Regards.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Streaming Analytics
Atatürk Mah. Turgut Özal Bulv.
Gardenya 5 Plaza K:6 Ataş
shed successfully
>
> 2017-04-21 15:54 GMT+03:00 Alper Tekinalp :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> So how should I handle that exception? Should I just ignore it? Is
>> there a way I can know when the data streamer successfully deliver
>> after getting that error? I just want to
tateException: Cache has been stopped: datastructures_0
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheGateway.checkState(
> GridCacheGateway.java:85)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheGateway.enter(
> GridCacheGateway.java:68)
>
ist not implement Serializable by itself.
>
> Evgenii
>
> 2017-04-24 19:18 GMT+03:00 Alper Tekinalp :
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I try to implement continuous query and it works fine on single node but
>> on mutiple nodes I get:
>>
java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:347)
at
org.apache.ignite.marshaller.jdk.JdkMarshaller.marshal0(JdkMarshaller.java:79)
... 11 more
My implementation class is attached. DeploymentEvent class implements
Serializable.
Can someone guide me what is wrong?
--
Alper Tekinalp
;>Note that there is no guarantee that data will be delivered after this
>> concrete attempt (e.g., it can fail when topology is changing), but it won't
>> be lost anyway.
>
> Evgenii
>
>
> 2017-04-21 13:24 GMT+03:00 Alper Tekinalp :
>>
>> Hi.
>>
&
cache RECORD_CACHE_XX, other server creates cache
FEC_XX. Bacause cache creation increases the minor topology version.
Is my understanding true?
If it is what is the reason?
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Streaming Analytics
Atatürk Mah. Turgut Özal Bulv.
Gardenya 5 Plaza K:6 Ataşehir
this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705
>> 18.x6.nabble.com/Error-while-running-query-against-Ignite-
>> Server-Node-tp11030p11643.html
>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software
o understand if Flusher threads also waits for smth.
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrey.
>>
>> Ignite logs are at the attachment.
>>
>> Interruption exception is on 30/Mar/2017 15:56:03. starvation log is on
>> the s
problem-tp11735p11772.html
>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Streaming Analytics
Atatürk Mah. Turgut Özal Bulv.
Gardenya 5 Plaza K:6 Ataşehir
34758 İSTANBUL
Tel: +90 216 455 01 53 Fax: +90 216 455 01 54
www.evam.com.tr
<http://www.evam.com>
-get-operation-tp11313p11775.html
>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrey V. Mashenkov
>
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Streaming Analytics
Atatürk Mah. Turgut Özal Bulv.
Gardenya 5 Plaza K:6 Ataşehir
34758 İSTANBUL
Tel: +90 216 455 01 53 Fax: +90 216 455 01 54
www.evam.com.tr
<http://www.evam.com>
ase share a grid configuration?
>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrey.
>>
>> The structure is a bit complicated. Let me try to explane: We have 2
>> types of applications: 1 is cache server which contains external caches, 1
>>
emote get operation.
>
> Are you sure your server 1 is standalone and has its own topology? I can't
> understand, how 1 and 3 connects to 1 as client.
> Would you please clarify?
>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Can som
Hi.
Can someone point me a direction that why a thread can stuck on the trace
above? Where should I look for? How can I investicate the issue? Where
should I look?
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
> Hi all.
>
>
> We have 3 ignite servers. Server 1 works a
t;
andrey.mashen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Alper,
>
> 1. I see ignite-1.5.0.final version in logs you provide.
> 2. Ignite doesn't have 1.8.3 version.
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I forget to mention about it
gt; On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> We see the following log on our servers:
>>
>>
>> *Failed to register marshalled class for more than 10 times in a row *
>> I could not relate it to an error so I dont have any
-core-1.5.0.final.jar:1.5.0.final]
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.
> IgniteCacheProxy.put(IgniteCacheProxy.java:1072)
> ~[ignite-core-1.5.0.final.jar:1.5.0.final]
>
> Thanks,
> Saurabh
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This email and any files transmitted
:
Where should we look for the main cause of the problem? What can cause such
a behaviour? There seems nothing wrong on server 1 logs etc.
We use ignite 1.8.3.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Streaming Analytics
Atatürk Mah. Turgut Özal Bulv.
Gardenya 5 Plaza K:6 Ataşehir
34758 İSTANBUL
it?
>
> Note: I am using C# language
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.
> 70518.x6.nabble.com/How-to-form-cluster-tp11177.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Alper Tekinalp
Softw
as well, and if so, it's a very critical issue.
>
> -Val
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.
> 70518.x6.nabble.com/Same-Affinity-For-Same-Key-On-All-
> Caches-tp10829p10979.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive a
Hi.
So do you think that kind of behaviour is a bug or is it as it has to be?
Will there be a ticket or shoul I handle it on my own?
Regards.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I guess I was wrong about the problem. The issue does not occur when
> dif
1, 192.168.1.42] => [127.0.0.1,
192.168.1.28][127.0.0.1, 192.168.1.28] => [127.0.0.1,
192.168.1.42][127.0.0.1, 192.168.1.42] => [127.0.0.1,
192.168.1.28][127.0.0.1, 192.168.1.28] => [127.0.0.1, 192.168.1.42]*
That is what I found while debugging. Sorry for verbose mail.
On Tue, Fe
-Val
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.
> 70518.x6.nabble.com/Same-Affinity-For-Same-Key-On-All-
> Caches-tp10829p10933.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
different caches.
You can find my test code and resuts as attachment.
So is that a bug? Is there a way to force same mappings althought caches
created on different nodes?
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Thanks for your comments. Let me investigate the iss
e:
>> >
>> > > Hi Alper,
>> > >
>> > > You can implement you own affinityFunction to achieve this.
>> > > In AF you should implement 2 mappings: key to partition and partition
>> to
>> > > node.
>> > >
>>
Hi all.
Is it possible to configures affinities in a way that partition for same
key will be on same node? So calling
ignite.affinity(CACHE).mapKeyToNode(KEY).id() with same key for any cache
will return same node id. Is that possible with a configuration etc.?
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software
ble.com/NullPointerException-on-ScanQuery-tp9413p9717.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Streaming Analytics
Atatürk Mah. Turgut Özal Bulv.
Gardenya 5 Plaza K:6 Ataşehir
34758 İSTANBUL
Tel: +90 216 455 01 53 Fax: +90 216 455 01 54
www.evam.com.tr
<http://www.evam.com>
can occur without any change in topology versions. In
the example/dummy code NPE happens before any change in topology versions
on cluster. But I could not convince him about that :) Or I am missing
somthing really badly.
Thanks all of you.
Regards.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam S
bled by default, you need call
> setStatisticsEnabled(true);
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I have the following code:
>> IgniteConfiguration igniteConfiguration = new
>> IgniteConfigura
.out.println(cemil.metrics().getOffHeapPuts());
System.out.println(cemil.metrics().getOffHeapEvictions());
System.out.println(cemil.metrics().getOffHeapHitPercentage());
All prints 0. Is that normal? Am i doing something wrong?
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Streaming Analy
Hi all.
Is there any comment on this?
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Streaming Analytics
Atatürk Mah. Turgut Özal Bulv.
Gardenya 5 Plaza K:6 Ataşehir
34758 İSTANBUL
Tel: +90 216 455 01 53 Fax: +90 216 455 01 54
www.evam.com.tr
<http://www.evam.com>
ternally running in our
application and we run scan query in that server nodes. In some cases both
of the servers destroy cache and I expect to get the cache closed errors.
But not NPEs because there is no change in topology.
Again thanks for your responses.
Regards.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software
Hi Andrey.
Did you able to look to the code?
Regards.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Could you please share your reproducer example?
>
>
> I added classes to repoduce the error. It also throws cache closed errors
> I am ok with it. But o
Hi.
Could you please share your reproducer example?
I added classes to repoduce the error. It also throws cache closed errors I
am ok with it. But others.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Streaming Analytics
Atatürk Mah. Turgut Özal Bulv.
Gardenya 5 Plaza K:6 Ataşehir
34758
ct
to get X form second method with 1,3 or 5. But in my case it seems I get
null.
> Did you executed query on stable topology?
>
Yes, the topology is not changing.
> Is it reproducible problem?
>
Yes, I get the same error once in a few tries.
Regards.
--
Alper Tekinalp
So
Hi all.
It seems one method uses affinity:
cctx.affinity().primaryPartitions(n.id(), topologyVersion());
other uses topology API.
cctx.topology().owners(part, topVer)
Are these two fully consistent?
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> We have 2 se
we get some partitions but
ignite cant find any owner for that partition?
Is our method for getting partitions wrong?
Is there any way to avoid that?
Best regards.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Streaming Analytics
Atatürk Mah. Turgut Özal Bulv.
Gardenya 5 Plaza K:6 Ataşehir
34758 İ
collect more information like logs etc.
Regard.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Streaming Analytics
Atatürk Mah. Turgut Özal Bulv.
Gardenya 5 Plaza K:6 Ataşehir
34758 İSTANBUL
Tel: +90 216 455 01 53 Fax: +90 216 455 01 54
www.evam.com.tr
<http://www.evam.com>
the
> info I requested. This is the only way to go with the investigation.
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2016-10-25 11:20 GMT+03:00 Alper Tekinalp :
>
> > Hi Yakov.
> >
> > I should also mention that we load cache data from one server and wait
> the
> > data to be repli
oduce the issue one more time, collect and share the
> following with us:
>
> 1. collect all the logs from all the nodes - clients and servers
> 2. take threaddumps of all JVMs (from all nodes) with jstack -l
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2016-10-25 10:49 GMT+03:00 Alper Tekinalp :
>
Hi.
There is also a few logs as :
Failed to register marshalled class for more than 10 times in a row (may
affect performance).
Can it be releated?
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> We have 3 servers and cache configuration like:
>
>
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.GridCacheAdapter.put(GridCacheAdapter.java:2215)
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheProxy.put(IgniteCacheProxy.java:1214)
... 11 more
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Streaming Analytics
Atatürk Mah. Turgut Özal Bulv.
Gardenya 5 Plaza K:6 Ataşehir
che-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Finding-Key-to-Node-Mapping-tp7653p7926.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Stream Analytics
Atatürk Mah.Turgut Özal Bulvarı Gardenya 1 Plaza 42/B K:4 Ataşehir / İSTANBUL
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Finding-Key-to-Node-Mapping-tp7653p7756.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Stream Analytics
At
se provide any additional details about your case if it is possible.
>
> In general the answer is not. Because the mapping is based on cluster
> topology.
> Affinity functions uses information about nodes IDs and nodes order.
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Alper Tekinalp wrot
Hi all.
It might be a silly question but is it possible to find cache key to node
mapping without starting an ignite instance (server or client)? I use
FairAffinityFucntion as affinity function?
Regards.
--
*Alper Tekinalp*
*Software Developer*
*Evam Stream Analytics*
*Atatürk
uggestions? What can we do about especially for second
case?
Regards.
--
*Alper Tekinalp*
*Software Developer*
*Evam Stream Analytics*
*Atatürk Mah.Turgut Özal Bulvarı Gardenya 1 Plaza 42/B K:4 Ataşehir /
İSTANBUL*
*Tlf : +90216 688 45 46 <%2B90216%20688%2045%2046> Fax : +90216 688
in cluster and be avare of server2
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Alper Tekinalp wrote:
> Hi Val.
>
> When I listen discovery events from server I get EVT_NODE_LEFT events
> even if client or server disconnects. If I listen events from client
> side if I have 1 server 1 clie
gt; http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Re-Server-node-info-when-client-disconnects-tp3562p3565.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Stream Analytics
Atatürk Mah.Turgut Özal Bulvarı Gardenya 1
Hi again.
I fix my issue by updating discoverySpi for client. When a server
joins cluster i create a new ip finder and add ip of both server1 and
server2. That way when I shutdown server1 client gets node left event
and stay in cluster.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alper Tekinalp wrote
seriously improved from usability
> standpoint, I will create a ticket.
>
> -Val
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Connecting-Amazon-cluster-with-client-from-local-tp3453p3464.html
> Sent from the Apache Ig
workaround that? Is there a suitable way to implement?
--
Alper Tekinalp
Software Developer
Evam Stream Analytics
Atatürk Mah.Turgut Özal Bulvarı Gardenya 1 Plaza 42/B K:4 Ataşehir / İSTANBUL
Tlf : +90216 688 45 46 Fax : +90216 688 45 47 Gsm:+90 536 222 76 01
www.evam.com
63 matches
Mail list logo
