Hi,
I need to understand when we mean LOCK, is this lock is acquired on entire
Cache or on record we are trying to update .
Please clarify .
Regards,
Gurmehar Singh
From: Alexei Scherbakov
Sent: 16 December 2021 22:40
To: user
Subject: Re: Transactional Reader Writer Locks
[CAUTION: This
Hi,
Issue got resolved after adding below line of code.
ignite.cluster().baselineAutoAdjustEnabled(true);
ignite.cluster().baselineAutoAdjustTimeout(1);
Regards,
Gurmehar Singh
From: Gurmehar Kalra
Sent: 25 November 2021 23:08
To: andrei ; user@ignite.apache.org
Subject: RE: Ignite
}finally {
if(!ObjectUtils.isEmpty(_lock)) {
_lock.unlock();
}
}
Regards,
Gurmehar Singh
From: andrei
Sent: 25 November 2021 16:48
To: Gurmehar Kalra ; user@ignite.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ignite Cluster Config Issue
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Or
/25/2021 11:24 AM, Gurmehar Kalra пишет:
Hi,
Team stuck with Issue with in Ignite Cluster where in Only Single Node is able
to read data from Ignite ,other Nodes are able to write data on to Ignite ,
data is shared with other Nodes,
Below is configuration
cache.setWriteSynchronizationMode
Hi,
Team stuck with Issue with in Ignite Cluster where in Only Single Node is able
to read data from Ignite ,other Nodes are able to write data on to Ignite ,
data is shared with other Nodes,
Below is configuration
cache.setWriteSynchronizationMode(CacheWriteSynchronizationMode.FULL_ASYNC);
ictionPolicy(1); " Howz
this linked to the cache definition you have done ?
BR
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 10:31 AM Gurmehar Kalra
mailto:gurmehar.ka...@hcl.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I am getting below stated exception , when trying to run 2 Nodes as server ,
I have around 10 different Caches
Hi,
I am getting below stated exception , when trying to run 2 Nodes as server ,
I have around 10 different Caches but exception is coming for 3 Cache only.
I am configuring all cache as
cache.setWriteSynchronizationMode(CacheWriteSynchronizationMode.FULL_ASYNC);
Hi,
Using Apache Ignite 2.10, with config as
cache.setWriteSynchronizationMode(CacheWriteSynchronizationMode.FULL_ASYNC);
cache.setAtomicityMode(CacheAtomicityMode.TRANSACTIONAL);
cache.setCacheMode(CacheMode.REPLICATED);
cache.setGroupName("EngineGroup");
]
at
org.apache.ignite.internal.managers.GridManagerAdapter.startSpi(GridManagerAdapter.java:297)
~[ignite-core-2.7.6.jar:2.7.6]
... 52 common frames omitted
Regards,
Gurmehar Singh
From: Gurmehar Kalra
Sent: 04 November 2020 13:34
To: user@ignite.apache.org
Cc: Andrei Aleksandrov
Subject: RE: Ignite
with ignite.cluster().active(true); ?
However, yes, all of your data nodes should be in baseline topology. Could you
collect logs from your servers?
BR,
Andrei
10/30/2020 2:28 PM, Gurmehar Kalra пишет:
Hi,
I tried changes suggested by you , waited for nodes and then tried to start
cluster
7C3000=EiZeVORdR03LAr%2BUworeIBxeP3%2F3LfosUg5izvFylu0%3D=0>
If you are not using persistence, please provide additional information that
"data is being added to the cache but not available to any of the modules."
means:
1) How you access data
2) What do you see in the logs
BR,
Andrei
Hi,
I have two module(Web and Engine) and want to share data b/w the modules , but
when I run web and engine together , data is added to cache but is not
available to either of modules.
below is my ignite config, which is same in both modules
config.setActiveOnStart(true);
12 matches
Mail list logo