Thanks for the reply.
I decided to use Strings with ASCII encoding.
Regards,
Oru
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/byte-as-a-key-in-Ignite-cache-tp9728p9736.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi There!
I am currently writing my java program to access ignite cache primarily by
using IgniteCache's .get method.
Is it advisable to use indexed SQL based queries (for performance reason
only) ? or the search speed of both is the same?
Thanks
Oru
--
View this message in context:
Hi There!
I have a situation where I need to have a Java String as a key in a
distributed Ignite Cache across multiple server nodes.
I realize that strings do take double the space as compared to bytes in
java.
So it is possible or recommended to use a byte[] as a key in Ignite Cache?
What's the
Hi,
Thank you for the response.
It works now.
Regards,
Debasish
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Unordered-Messages-do-not-arrive-on-a-different-Thread-tp5160p5165.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi There!
While experimenting with Topic Based Messaging I found that the Listener
cannot receive unordered messages if the listener is on another Java Thread.
This limitation does not hold true for ordered messaging.
I am attaching the Java Project as a Zip file.
Please let me know what's wrong.
I
Solved!
Disabled this line in Java.
//cfg.setLocalHost("127.0.0.1");
Hope this will help someone.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Failed-to-start-manager-GridManagerAdapter-tp1997p1998.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive
2015 Copyright(C) Apache Software Foundation
[08:18:00]
[08:18:00] Ignite documentation: http://ignite.apache.org
[08:18:00]
[08:18:00] Quiet mode.
[08:18:00] ^-- Logging to file
'/home/oru/Downloads/apache-ignite-fabric-1.4.0-bin/work/log/ignite-30644b1c.0.log'
[08:18:00] ^-- To see **FUL
I migrated to Linux. Goodbye Microsoft! Problem Solved!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Unable-to-connect-to-Local-Node-Only-tp1852p1996.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I know that's the correct behavior, but that's not the issue here.
The issue is that even though there is a local server running still the
local client is unable to connect to it locally.
This is when TCPDiscoverySPI is in use.
Is this also correct behavior?
--
View this message in context:
htt
Hello and thanks for the reply.
No i am not able to connect using any local ip also. I can only connect to
local server if i have an active remote server node running.
On Nov 6, 2015 5:01 AM, "vkulichenko [via Apache Ignite Users]" <
ml-node+s70518n1855...@n6.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you p
10 matches
Mail list logo