.
Pascal
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/MemoryPolicy-size-vs-cache-size-tp15892p15951.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ect that during the
query the data would be read from disk. Why is this not happening and what
do I need to change to test this?
Thanks for yo
size= 279MB count=1048576 avgItemSize=279
size= 551MB count=2097152 avgItemSize=275
size= 1103MB count=4194304 avgItemSize=275
I assume the amount of unsued free space is negligible with caches bigger
than +/- 32MB. Correct?
Pascal
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite
ain.
Pascal
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Measuring-cache-size-and-performance-tp14072p14147.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
slow? Is it possible other ways of
retrieving the data are tried first, and then, after those fail, the
NullCache is used?
Thanks again for your help.
Pascal
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Read-through-cache-performance-tp14085p14116.html
Sent
econd
ReadThroughCache: 44537 reads/second
ReadThroughCache: 46838 reads/second
ReadThroughCache: 44929 reads/second
ReadThroughCache: 47001 reads/second
ReadThroughCache: 49743 reads/second
Thank you for your help.
Pascal
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Re
70430-sha1:d4eef3c6
[21:17:35] OS: Windows 7 6.1 amd64
[21:17:39] Topology snapshot [ver=1, servers=1, clients=0, CPUs=12,
heap=7.1GB]
* EmptyCache: 928505 reads/second
ReadThroughCache: 29709 reads/second*
I don't expect the same speed as an empty cache
e in the cache.
2) Are these timings and sizes realistic for Ignite? The avgItemSize is
about twice as high as I would expect for such a simple POJO together with a
hashmap.
3) Can my code be improved to more reliably measure the real-world
performance of Ignite?
Thank you very much for your help.
Pas
