Re: Issue with Ignite + Zeppelin

Hi, Can you show the server node log? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Issue-with-Ignite-Zeppelin-tp14990p15014.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Exception while using Transactions and Write Through

Hi Narayana, Can you show the code that is working and that code that is not working? Also note that SQL queries are currently not enlisted in transactions anyway, so most likely you're not having semantics that you expect. Transactional support for SQL is expected sometime this year. -Val --

Re: Unable to start the ignite.sh in verbose mode

If you mean that it hangs, then please attach thread dump. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Unable-to-start-the-ignite-sh-in-verbose-mode-tp14477p14607.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Loading similar data to specific instance and not all instances

Hi Aiden, Technically this should be done as I already described on SO [1]. You will need to remodel the data so that the portion of data used for collocation is represented as a separate field, this field has to be part of key object and configured as affinity key. [1] https://stackoverflow.com/

Re: Can java code look up cache in server without Ignition.start(cfg)

Hi Saji, Kill command kill the process, it's designed more for standalone server nodes rather than embedded clients. What is the condition when you may want to stop the client? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Can-java-code-look-up-cache-in-

Re: Data eviction to disk

I would also add that 2.1 will have brand new persistence storage that will make all cache work transparently across memory and disk. You will not have to worry about where the particular data actually resides. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.co

Re: how to store share the schema of RDD?

Hi Lei, Currently you can create a data frame only based on result set of a query, and this data frame will be local. We don't have support for data frames yet. And in case you're not using SQL, then Ignite is actually schema less. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-us

Re: Cache over HDFS

If you implement Hive over HDFS, there is no reason to have IGFS in the first place. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Cache-over-HDFS-tp13553p14515.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: when using putAll(), Is it possible to retrieve the conflicted list of objects when getting TransactionOptimisticException

Hi, I'm not sure it even make sense. If transaction is rolled back, all values included in this transaction are rolled back, so you have to retry the whole transaction. If you have frequent conflicts, then you should consider using pessimistic transaction instead. -Val -- View this message in

Re: Does the "Query Consistency" feature use MVCC?

Jeff, Consistency here means that queries never return partial updates. I.e. atomicity is guaranteed. However, queries are always executed outside of transactional scope, even if there is a ongoing transaction in the same thread. Basically, if transaction commits 2 entries, concurrently executed q

Re: Event Listeners

Sam, To avoid deserialization you can set CacheConfiguration#copyOnRead to false. As for clear(), there is no notification for it. Who triggers it? Can the client that calls clear(), then execute whatever needs to be executed as a post-action? You can use compute APIs for this, for example. -Val

Re: Ignite Information

You can read here about user attributes: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/cluster#cluster-node-attributes For the node filter example, refer to JavaDoc: https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/util/AttributeNodeFilter.java -Val -- View this

Re: Does the "Query Consistency" feature use MVCC?

Hi Jeff, Transactional consistency and MVCC is (and always will be) available only for transactional caches. But for queries MVCC is not supported at all yet. Queries are not enlisted in transactions and therefore you can get dirty reads. Full support will be added by the end of the year (hopefull

Re: frequet disconnection in ignite cluster

Rishi, Does the issue go away if you stop triggering monitoring every 5 minutes. Such frequency is very small, it should not cause any issues of course. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/frequet-disconnection-in-ignite-cluster-tp14411p14505.h

Re: Ignite Visor - Help

Hi Priya, You can provide path explicitly to open command: open -cpath /path/to/xml As for cache size, are you using 2.0? If yes, do you have on-heap cache enabled? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-Visor-Help-tp14481p14504.html Sent

Re: Event Listeners

Sam, It sounds like you can set CacheConfiguration#invalidate property to true. This will force Ignite to invalidate near cache entry on update rather that syncing it with a new value. Is this what you're looking for? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.n

Re: Loading similar data to specific instance and not all instances

Hi, Can you please tell what is a business use case behind this? What exactly are you trying to achieve with Ignite? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Loading-similar-data-to-specific-instance-and-not-all-instances-tp14387p14502.html Sent fro

Re: Ignite Info

Hi, Riccardo Iacomini wrote >- Will a local file system persistence strategy be available in future >releases of Ignite? The new disk storage will be available in 2.1. Riccardo Iacomini wrote >- Using the write-behind mode, will operations on the cache still be >mapped 1 on 1 o

Re: Ignite Info

Hi, -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-Info-tp14473p14499.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Connecting to remote host from client gives error

It's something in your network. If you can't telnet to this address, Ignite will obviously not able to connect either. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Connecting-to-remote-host-from-client-gives-error-tp14395p14498.html Sent from the Apache

Re: Unable to start the ignite.sh in verbose mode

Where is the error? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Unable-to-start-the-ignite-sh-in-verbose-mode-tp14477p14496.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Async Service proxy

Artem, The whole point of service proxy is to allow remote execution via API that *you* created. Therefore, if this API returns some result, this can be done only synchronously. In case there is no result, you can trigger async execution within the service itself and return right away. Another opt

Re: NodeFilter for cache and GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture (Failed to wait for partition release future)

Vladimir wrote > It is just a test. In real project, of course, there are many nodes > holding the cache. Node A represents a part of cluster. You can lose the whole cluster group as well. My point is that getting in cache during initialization doesn't make it safe, because cache can disappear in

Re: Ignite 1.6.0 suspected memory leak from DynamicCacheDescriptor

Hi Rishi, ignite.cluster().nodes() will give the list of nodes and full information about topology. Will this work for you? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-1-6-0-suspected-memory-leak-from-DynamicCacheDescriptor-tp9443p14492.html Sen

Re: Connecting to remote host from client gives error

Then it might be blocked by firewall. These messages simply mean that client can't establish connection with this socket address. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Connecting-to-remote-host-from-client-gives-error-tp14395p1.html Sent from

Re: cassandra cache store with port

Srini, Please refer to [1] for information on how to use the store and configuration examples. If default port is not 9042, then I don't see an issue. You have to either explicitly specify your default port, or provide all addresses as host:port strings. [1] https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/do

Re: Cache refresh because of hibernate versioning mechanism.

Hi Czeslaw, Please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community can receive email notifications for your messages. To subscribe, send empty email to user-subscr...@ignite.apache.org and follow simple instructions in the reply. cszczotka wrote > I’m using cache with read-through/w

Re: Connecting to remote host from client gives error

You're starting a client node and it connect to server cluster. Do you have any server nodes? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Connecting-to-remote-host-from-client-gives-error-tp14395p14434.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list

Re: Compute Node computation on data node

Hi, Please take a look and play with examples provided by Ignite: https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/examples/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/examples/computegrid They show how to do this kind of basic operations. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705

Re: Ignite 2.0 vs Ignite 1.7 (or later)

Hi, What exactly is consuming the memory? Do you have a heap dump? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-2-0-vs-Ignite-1-7-or-later-tp14401p14432.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Event Listeners

Sam, What is the business use case behind this? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Event-Listeners-tp8306p14431.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Ignite 1.6.0 suspected memory leak from DynamicCacheDescriptor

Tom, It sounds like these jobs are triggered pretty frequently. So why not create a small application that will create an embedded client once and also have an internal timer or cron based scheduler to execute jobs periodically. You can do the topology check within this application as well, instea

Re: Optimum CacheConfiguration for cross cache join SQL queries

iostream wrote > Hi, > > I have 2 caches, each with POJO values that look like - > > public class Value1 { > > @QuerySqlField(index = true) > private Long a; > > @QuerySqlField(index = true) > private String b; > > } > > public class Value2 { > > @QuerySqlField(

Re: Optimum CacheConfiguration for cross cache join SQL queries

Hi, Please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community can receive email notifications for your messages. To subscribe, send empty email to user-subscr...@ignite.apache.org and follow simple instructions in the reply. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-use

RE: Dynamically update the Cache Configuration without restsrting client and serve

Priya, There are no configuration properties that can be changed in runtime. However, most of your requirements seem to be related to dynamic schema change. This already happens transparently on object level thanks to binary format [1] used as a default data storage format. On SQL level this will

Re: Mix in cache keys objects with different types.

Alexander, It doesn't matter if you use SQL. Without SQL it should work though. Did you get any exception when you tried this? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Mix-in-cache-keys-objects-with-different-types-tp14354p14426.html Sent from the A

Re: The client does not receive response after closure completion...

Hi Alexander, Ticket for this already exists for a while: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5189 You can try to set java.net.preferIPv4Stack=true system property, usually it helps to avoid this exception. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.na

Re: FairAffinityFunction in Ignite 2.0

Hi Alexander, This function provided inconsistent mapping for caches created on different topology versions. Basically this means that collocation was not working properly in some scenario, so we decided to get rid of this function. Please use RendezvousAffinityFunction instead. -Val -- View t

Re: Ignite Information

Hi, See CacheConfiguration#nodeFilter property. It's just a predicate that filters out nodes, cache will be deployed only on those for which filter returns true. The easiest way would be to set custom attributes via IgniteConfiguration#userAttributes and filter out using AttributeNodeFilter which

Re: Starting the Server

Try to set java.net.preferIPv4Stack=true system property on all nodes. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Starting-the-Server-tp14398p14422.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Unable to connect from Windows Java client to Linux server cluster (ignite 2.0.0)

Hi Roger, This is a known issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5189 Try to set java.net.preferIPv4Stack=true system property. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Unable-to-connect-from-Windows-Java-client-to-Linux-server-cluster

Re: frequet disconnection in ignite cluster

Rishi, This is usually caused by either network or memory issues. Check that you don't have any network glitches and that there are no GC pauses, memory leaks, etc. on the nodes. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/frequet-disconnection-in-igni

Re: cassandra cache store with port

Hi Srini, Is Cassandra listening to port other than 9042? Also how do you configure Cassandra store? connection.properties file is used only in tests, Ignite doesn't actually provide this way of configuring. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com

Re: Volatile Kubernetes Node Discovery

Hi Stephen, Please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community can receive email notifications for your messages. To subscribe, send empty email to user-subscr...@ignite.apache.org and follow simple instructions in the reply. macdonagh wrote > Are there logs which will show the

Re: Large Key, eg UUID or String

Hi Roger, It's perfectly fine to use UUID as a key. In case of composite key I would recommend to create a class with multiple fields to encapsulate all values there. Auto generation is not supported, at least for now. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6

Re: Event Listeners

Hi Sam, Continuous queries only work with data update operations like put, remove, etc. So to get notification you should use remove() method instead of clear(). If you have a persistence store and you don't want to remove from there, you can do this as a workaround: cache.withSkipStore().remove(

Re: Web-Console query on Oracle database cache return empty resultset

BTW, in 2.1 Ignite will introduce persistence storage that will allow to execute SQL queries without preloading data into memory. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Web-Console-query-on-Oracle-database-cache-return-empty-resultset-tp13546p14360

Re: Mix in cache keys objects with different types.

Hi Alexander, Having a separate cache per data type always was recommended, as it provides better isolation of data sets from each other, and therefore less error prone. In 2.0 this became a requirement due to architectural changes and leaning towards SQL database. -Val -- View this message in

RE: Possible race condition when starting up Ignite nodes taking part in partition affinity map

Hi Raymond, Got it. Feel free to let us know in case you have more information. I would great to have more insight and improve performance if needed. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Possible-race-condition-when-starting-up-Ignite-nodes-taki

Re: Keep two caches "consistent"

Hi Artem, I think the only way to do this synchronously and consistently is to manually load all required objects from database and put them all within a single transaction. You can't do synchronous updates in continuous query listener as it can cause a deadlock. -Val -- View this message in

Re: Use AtomicLong or AtomicSequence in Streaming

Hi, Is it the same issue that is discussed in http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Streaming-test-td14039.html? Someone will take a look at your project and respond there. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Use-AtomicLong-or-AtomicSe

RE: Release 1.9.x?

Hi Steve, Community doesn't do maintenance releases, so you will have to do the build by yourself. Also there are 3rd party vendors like GridGain (www.gridgain.com) that provide professional support for Ignite and can help you with this. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ig

Re: The client does not receive response after closure completion...

Hi Alexander, We need to understand why null appeared there and fix this root cause instead of fixing the consequence. Do you have any tests that you can share? Also would be great is you create a Jira ticket and send a message to dev list, this discussion belongs there I think. -Val -- View

RE: Possible race condition when starting up Ignite nodes taking part in partition affinity map

Hi Raymond, What exactly is slower? Can you provide any tests? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Possible-race-condition-when-starting-up-Ignite-nodes-taking-part-in-partition-affinity-map-tp14293p14349.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users

Re: Apache heap getting increase with cacheConfig.setCopyOnRead as false

Prashant, This is maximum heap size controlled by JVM Xmx property. I guess you just set the same for both server and client. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Apache-heap-getting-increase-with-cacheConfig-setCopyOnRead-as-false-tp14175p14348

Re: NodeFilter for cache and GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture (Failed to wait for partition release future)

Hi Vladimir, Vladimir wrote > Node B must know wheter the cache is already created. If not it must not > start to avoid such runtime problems. That's why the cache is acquired at > the initialization. That looks like reasonable and comfortable way. What is the exact scenario when cache is not av

RE: Dynamically update the Cache Configuration without restsrting client and serve

Hi Priya, Cache configuration can't be changed in runtime in any of the versions. What properties are you looking to change exactly? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Dynamically-update-the-Cache-Configuration-without-restsrting-client-and-se

RE: Group index taking too much time

Did you check the execution plan? Is index properly used? Also how big is result set returned by the query before 'limit 10' is applied? BTW, it's generally not valid to do 'limit 10' without ordering, as you can get different results from consequent execution of the same query with the same data

Re: Ignite Remote Caching

Hi, Please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community can receive email notifications for your messages. To subscribe, send empty email to user-subscr...@ignite.apache.org and follow simple instructions in the reply. abhishek dutta gupta wrote > I have query on how we can acces

Re: Using Camel-Ignite for inserting json object to Ignite's Cache

Hi Austin, Can you ask Camel community about this? I'm not sure if this is a valid test or not. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Using-Camel-Ignite-for-inserting-json-object-to-Ignite-s-Cache-tp13513p14296.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Us

Re: Ignite Remote Caching

abhishek dutta gupta wrote > Can we write custom query? How good is the query part of this apart from > Infinispan? What are the advantages rather than Infinispan? Ignite fully supports SQL querying, so you can execute any query that is possible with SQL. abhishek dutta gupta wrote > How we can

Re: assign alias for table name using annotations

No, this can be done only via QueryEntity. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/assign-alias-for-table-name-using-annotations-tp13759p14292.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: cache insert/update performance

Hi Dmitri, I think the answer is no. What's is the purpose of this? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/cache-insert-update-performance-tp14049p14291.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Modelling Question

Hi Gordon, Separate cache per type is recommended approach. Feel free to use it. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Modelling-Question-tp14087p14290.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: NodeFilter for cache and GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture (Failed to wait for partition release future)

What is IgniteDictionaryMapper class? It creates cache within Spring bean initialization, and then the cache tries to acquire a bean for cache store in another thread. This thread tries to acquire the same Spring lock which causes a deadlock. See 'main' thread in the same thread dump. I think you

Re: How to create a dump of updated data in cache

This thread is a duplicate: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/How-to-create-a-dump-of-updated-data-in-cache-into-local-td14268.html -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/How-to-create-a-dump-of-updated-data-in-cache-tp14269p14288.html

Re: How to create a dump of updated data in cache into local

Responded on SO: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44884312/ignite-data-backup-in-hard-disk -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/How-to-create-a-dump-of-updated-data-in-cache-into-local-tp14268p14287.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users maili

Re: Apache heap getting increase with cacheConfig.setCopyOnRead as false

Prashant, Do you mean that you have a client and a server on the same box? If so, why do you need that? Client node is also a JVM process and it will always consume some memory. Of course, much less than server as it doesn't store data. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-igni

Re: Web-Console query on Oracle database cache return empty resultset

Read-through doesn't work with SQL queries, only with key based access. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Web-Console-query-on-Oracle-database-cache-return-empty-resultset-tp13546p14285.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archi

Re: R: Memory Leak or my Error?

Devis, Suggestion would be not to create a new thread for each request :) It looks like you're using some kind of framework, so don't know how this should be done properly there, but generally thread creation is a heavy operation by itself, so it's always better to use thread pools. Additionally,

Re: Failed to wait for initial partition map exchange

This looks like a network issue. Please check that connections can be established between any nodes in topology and nothing is blocked by firewall. Note that connectivity must be bidirectional, even for clients (i.e. server node can establish TCP connection with client node). Also note that both di

Re: Concurrent job execution and FifoQueueCollisionSpi.parallelJobsNumber=1

Hi Ryan, Yes, I think. But note that will create a high contention on this method - each job request will acquire the same lock. Although, it's probably not an issue in your case as you do not allow to execute more than one job at a time anyway. -Val -- View this message in context: http://ap

Re: Grid/Cluster unique UUID possible with IgniteUuid?

Muthu, IgniteAtomicSequence generates unique long value, while IgniteUuid is a heavier object. Other than that, they provide similar guarantees. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Grid-Cluster-unique-UUID-possible-with-IgniteUuid-tp13574p14281

Re: IGFS Question

If you're reloading data from IGFS to a regular cache, why do you need IGFS in the first place? Why not load data directly in the cache? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/IGFS-Question-tp13447p14280.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users maili

Re: odd query plan with joins?

Hi Doug, _key is implicitly indexed, no need to configure additional index for it. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/odd-query-plan-with-joins-tp13680p14279.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Ignite Cassandra Exception

nash1k wrote > hi! > Did you resolve this problem? We have the same issue and can't do anything > with it. Yep cassandra is under high load but how we can fix it? More > cassandra nodes or more ignite nodes? Or may be there are some hacks? > (read through, write through, write behind with batches a

Re: Fetch column names in sql query results

There is no way to do this in 2.0. You'll have to wait for 2.1. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Fetch-column-names-in-sql-query-results-tp14089p14277.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Apache heap getting increase with cacheConfig.setCopyOnRead as false

Prashant, To avoid what? Why did you set copyOnRead to false in the first place? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Apache-heap-getting-increase-with-cacheConfig-setCopyOnRead-as-false-tp14175p14190.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users maili

Re: NodeFilter for cache and GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture (Failed to wait for partition release future)

Please attach full verbose logs and thread dumps from both nodes. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/NodeFilter-for-cache-and-GridDhtPartitionsExchangeFuture-Failed-to-wait-for-partition-release-future-tp14179p14185.html Sent from the Apache Ig

Re: Apache heap getting increase with cacheConfig.setCopyOnRead as false

Prashant, Ignite always stores binary representation of an object. Whenever you read it, its is deserialized which actually creates a copy. In case copyOnRead is set to false, deserialized object if also cached so that deserialization step is skipped. But this doubles memory consumption. -Val

Re: Server node fails to start with exception IllegalThreadStateException

What threads are left behind? Do you have a thread dump that you can show? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Server-node-fails-to-start-with-exception-IllegalThreadStateException-tp14150p14171.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing lis

Re: Google cloud deployment in embedded mode

Hi Sumanta, The way how nodes discover each other depends only on discovery configuration, it doesn't matter if nodes are started in embedded or standalone mode. Please refer to [1] for all available options. On Google Cloud you can use native integration [2]. [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/d

Re: Can java code look up cache in server without Ignition.start(cfg)

Saji, You're using try-with-resources syntax, which calls Ignite.close() at the end and therefore stops the node. Getting rid of it will do the trick. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Can-java-code-look-up-cache-in-server-without-Ignition-st

Re: Concurrent job execution and FifoQueueCollisionSpi.parallelJobsNumber=1

Ryan, Yes, this is about IgniteMessaging API. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Concurrent-job-execution-and-FifoQueueCollisionSpi-parallelJobsNumber-1-tp8697p13586.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Concurrent job execution and FifoQueueCollisionSpi.parallelJobsNumber=1

Ryan, I added a comment in the ticket. I would recommend you to set the size of public thread pool to 1 (IgniteConfiguration#publicThreadPoolSize) to make sure that jobs are not executed in parallel. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Concurre

Re: Swapping to Disk Ignite 2.0

Agree :) -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Swapping-to-Disk-Ignite-2-0-tp13522p13578.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: How to operate with cache<*Key, *> or cache,*>?

Hi, Please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community can receive email notifications for your messages. To subscribe, send empty email to user-subscr...@ignite.apache.org and follow simple instructions in the reply. Artёm Basov wrote > Lets take example from > https://apachei

Re: Two Continuous Queries listening to same event

Continuous queries are independent from each other and both will get all required notifications with exactly-once guarantee. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Two-Continuous-Queries-listening-to-same-event-tp13571p13575.html Sent from the Apac

Re: Using Camel-Ignite for inserting json object to Ignite's Cache

Hi Austin, I'm probably missing something, but why do you expect this to insert entry into cache? Where did you find the syntax below? .to("ignite-cache:cache:myCacheName?operation=PUT") -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Using-Camel-Ignite-f

Re: Swapping to Disk Ignite 2.0

For on-heap memory you can use eviction policies: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/evictions For off-heap limit is specified in CacheConfiguration#offHeapMaxMemory property. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Swapping-to-Disk-Ignite-2-0-tp13

Re: Updating a PART(one field) of the "value" object at scale

Raja, First of all, it sounds like entry processor fits your use case a bit better: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/jcache#entryprocessor But in any case, you should debug and profile your execution first. Is everything working as expected? What is taking time? Etc. -Val -- View this mess

Re: IGFS Question

IGFS cache can't and should not be accessed directly. Use FileSystem API for this. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/IGFS-Question-tp13447p13536.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Failed to wait for initial partition map exchange

Please attach full logs. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Failed-to-wait-for-initial-partition-map-exchange-tp6252p13487.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Blocked get operation problem

In 1.9 you can use read-only processor to avoid locking: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4932 -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Blocked-get-operation-problem-tp9133p13441.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive

Re: Concurrent job execution and FifoQueueCollisionSpi.parallelJobsNumber=1

Hi Ryan, I will take a look this week. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Concurrent-job-execution-and-FifoQueueCollisionSpi-parallelJobsNumber-1-tp8697p13440.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Failed to wait for initial partition map exchange

Vladimir, As I told before, this message is very generic and can be caused by multiple reasons (sometimes it's not even an issue BTW - it's warning, not an error). First things to check is memory consumption, GC and network. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.705

Re: Ignite cache range query using cache keys

You need to provide correct value class when executing a query, in your case it should be ArrayList. The "ArrayList.class" that you provided there doesn't make any sense. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Ignite-cache-range-query-using-cache-k

Re: Understanding Swap Space feature-- how it works?

Basically, swap space is another storage layer. You have on-heap, off-heap and then swap. So in case of on-heap mode only entry will be written in swap when it's evicted from cache due to eviction policy. With off-heap enabled it will be written to swap when it's evicted from there due to off-heap

Re: How to detect if Ignite server nodes are connectable

Hi David, You can use TcpDiscoverySpi#joinTimeout for this. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/How-to-detect-if-Ignite-server-nodes-are-connectable-tp12992p13000.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Failed to wait for initial partition map exchange

Generally, you can't add new node while holding a lock. If you're holding locks for long period of time, I would recommend you to revisit the architecture. In any case, make sure that you properly release all the locks. Also I think you should to upgrade to the latest version, I believe there were

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >