Hi,
How can I do paging when query from ignite cache?
Can I get records by range? specific page?
If I have 1 rows of records with page size set to 20, how can I get the
21-40 (Page 2)?
Hi,
I would like to know how to specify the connection ip if the server has
more than one ips during the TCP Discovery.
Server A has 2 lan cards and so 2 ips (e.g. 1.2.3.4 and 7.8.9.0).
I have applied the following configuration for the TCP discovery and the
server is well connected.
However, whe
hi,
I have tried to implement the cache with Affinity Collocation
Object personKey1 = new AffinityKey("myPersonId1",
"myCompanyId");Object personKey2 = new AffinityKey("myPersonId2",
"myCompanyId");
Person p1 = new Person(personKey1, ...);Person p2 = new
Person(personKey2, ...);
// Both, the com
> Or I missed smth?
>
> Anyway, if you do not get a speed up but you sure you should, then a
> bottleneck have to be found at first.
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:02 AM, woo charles
> wrote:
>
>> If the data is buffered in client side, the bottleneck should be als
If the data is buffered in client side, the bottleneck should be also in
client side.
If I use 2 programs to input same set data, it should be a significant
change in data input time.
Is it right?
2017-04-21 6:46 GMT+08:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan :
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:16 PM, woo c
treamer (call addData) slowly
> and it is possible to utilize more resources for it. Of course remote nodes
> should be able to bear pressure of data.
> Performance can increased, but usually slightly as network will be a
> bottleneck.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:29 PM, woo ch
ads.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:30 AM, woo charles
> wrote:
>
>> When I try to input data(80 table, each 1 records) to a cluster with
>> 3 server node(each 2 gb), it only has a small change in time if multi
>> thread is performed
>> (ie. max decrease
When I try to input data(80 table, each 1 records) to a cluster with 3
server node(each 2 gb), it only has a small change in time if multi thread
is performed
(ie. max decrease from 8s to 6.5s if using IgniteCache)
Is it normal?
Also, I found that multi thread do not affect the data input spe
time reduced to 50-60ms in
>>> client mode.
>>>
>>> I've used a trick to avoid declaring all the caches in configuration
>>> file or calling getOrCreateCache for each of them.
>>> To give it a try, just add the line below before the queries execution
>&g
Did you update the token in default.properties?
The Security token in your new setup web console should be different from
GridGain web console one.
2017-04-13 16:13 GMT+08:00 ArcherUnicorn <969959...@qq.com>:
> My "URI to Ignite node REST server:" is "https://console.gridgain.com"; ,
> and
> I ca
For my testing web console, its console server is pointed to 9000 port not
3000 port.
2017-04-13 13:42 GMT+08:00 Harish Patibandla :
> Hi Everyone,
>I am unable to run web agent on the server , web console is up and
> running but was unable to get the agent running .I am getting below error
>
therefore allowing to skip these on the
> next query runs.
> To disable client mode in your example just pass false to
> Ignition.setClientMode(true)
>
> Kind regards,
> Alex
>
>
>
> 13 апр. 2017 г. 5:22 AM пользователь "woo charles [via Apache Ignite
> User
You are running the query from a client node what implies additional
>> network round trips.
>> Try to run queries from a server node. In my environment it reduced the
>> time from about 7 seconds to 220ms for the first run.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Alex.
>>
&
r it what takes some additional time compared to the
>> following runs.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Alex
>>
>> 10 апр. 2017 г. 8:13 AM пользователь "woo charles [via Apache Ignite
>> Users]" <[hidden email]
>> <http:///user/SendEmail.j
Hi,
I set up 3 Server nodes(8 cpu, 1gb ram) in the same server.
2 table each 1 rows are entered.
When I perform a *SQL Join* query on two table and run it 100 times, I
found that the first query is much slower than other(i.e. First query used
13s & other used around 0.02s).
Why will it happe
Can I move some connections to other nodes in order to reduce the workload
on the oldest server node?
2017-04-03 22:26 GMT+08:00 Nikolai Tikhonov :
> Yes, it's absolutely ok. Do not worry:)
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:01 AM, woo charles
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>
Hi,
I have conducted a test on distributed query performance.
I have created 5 server nodes(java) in 3 different server.
4 records are entered.
I created 80 Threads and each thread looped following sql 100 times.
select * from user where age<18
(about 50 records is selected)
*** age is not
s/network-config
> 3. https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/leader-election
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:16 AM, woo charles
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have created 5 server nodes in 5 jvm process in 3 jvms.
>>
>> After the client node has started up, t
Hi
I have created 5 server nodes in 5 jvm process in 3 jvms.
After the client node has started up, the oldest server node will establish
a connection to the client node through client's communication port (471XX)
periodically.
May I know the reasons for this?
if it is because of Leader Election,
19 matches
Mail list logo
