Re: Fair queue polling policy?

ity and, maybe, performance. >> >>   >> >> Overall, I don’t think it’s a bug in Ignite, and we would need a >> solid justification to change the behavior. >> >>   >> >> Do you have a use case when a random distribution is important? >> >>

Re: Fair queue polling policy?

a use case when a random distribution is important? > >   > > Stan > >   > > *From: *Peter <mailto:graphhop...@gmx.de> > *Sent: *30 ноября 2018 г. 17:30 > *To: *user@ignite.apache.org <mailto:user@ignite.apache.org> > *Subject: *Re: Fair queue polling pol

RE: Fair queue polling policy?

is important? Stan From: Peter Sent: 30 ноября 2018 г. 17:30 To: user@ignite.apache.org Subject: Re: Fair queue polling policy? Hello, I have found this discussion about the same topic and indeed the example there works and the queues poll fair. And when I tweak the sleep after put and take, so

Re: Fair queue polling policy?

Hello, I have found this discussion about the same topic and indeed the example there works and the queues poll fair. And when I tweak the sleep after put and take, so that

Fair queue polling policy?

Hello, My aim is a queue for load balancing that is described in the documentation : create an "ideally balanced system where every node only takes the number of jobs it can process, and not more."