Sam,
Can you provide a code example that I can run to see what the issue is? Now
it's not clear to me.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/GET-with-LIKE-operator-for-keys-tp7381p7565.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list ar
without knowing object type being queried. I might be wrong here and that is
the reason need help from experts.
--Sam
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/GET-with-LIKE-operator-for-keys-tp7381p7521.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list
re good here.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/GET-with-LIKE-operator-for-keys-tp7381p7493.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/GET-with-LIKE-operator-for-keys-tp7381p7491.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thank you again. My bad I missed 'Predefined Fields' note from
documentation.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/GET-with-LIKE-operator-for-keys-tp7381p7415.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/GET-with-LIKE-operator-for-keys-tp7381p7382.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
('%January%')
--Sam
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/GET-with-LIKE-operator-for-keys-tp7381.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.