Re: ML stable and performance

2019-09-18 Thread Alexey Zinoviev
I've started the discussion here http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Proposed-Release-2-7-7-2-7-6-ML-extra-fixed-bugs-td43537.html пт, 13 сент. 2019 г. в 22:12, Alexey Zinoviev : > The reason was that the last year there is no significant releases of > Ignite between 2.7 and 2.

Re: ML stable and performance

2019-09-13 Thread Alexey Zinoviev
The reason was that the last year there is no significant releases of Ignite between 2.7 and 2.8, only minor releases with long story of renaming. I am and another ML guys are ready in 1-2 months prepare ML module for 2.8 or for the minor release 2.7.7 = 2.7.6 + updated ML + new fixed bugs Let's d

Re: ML stable and performance

2019-09-13 Thread Denis Magda
Alexey, I'm wondering, Are there any dependencies on Ignite Core that make us put off the ML changes release until 2.8? I know that you do not support the idea of ML as a separate Ignite module but this concept would allow us to release ML as frequently as we want not being blocked by Ignite core

Re: ML stable and performance

2019-09-13 Thread Alexey Zinoviev
I could answer as one of developers of ML module. Currently is available the ML in version 2.7.5, it supports a lot of algorithms and could be used in production, but the API is not stable and will be changed in 2.8 The ML module will be stable since next release 2.8, also we have no performance r

Re: ML stable and performance

2019-09-13 Thread Denis Magda
David, Let me loop in Ignite dev list that has Ignite ML experts subscribed. Please, could you share more details in regards to your performance testing and objectives for Ignite ML overall? The module is ready for production and we're ready to help solve any cornerstones. - Denis On Fri, Sep

Re: ML stable and performance

2019-09-06 Thread David Williams
Python is 25 times slower than Java for ML at runtimes, which I found out online. But I don't know that statement is true or not. I need insiders' opinion. Which ml other packages are best options for Ignite? On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 7:28 PM Mikael wrote: > Hi! > > I have never used it myself but

Re: ML stable and performance

2019-09-06 Thread Mikael
Hi! I have never used it myself but it's been there for long time and I would expect it to be stable, and yes it will run distributed, I can't say anything about performance as I have never used it. You will find a lot of more information at: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/machine-learn

ML stable and performance

2019-09-06 Thread David Williams
I am evaluating ML framework for Java platform. I knew Ignite has ML package. But I like to know its stability and performance for production. Can Ignite ML code run in distribute way? Except its own ML package, which ml packages are best options for Ignite?