Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-07-05 Thread Peter Schmitt
t;> >> Kind regards >> Peter >> >> >> >> 2016-06-30 22:23 GMT+02:00 vkulichenko : >> >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> It sound like you just don't give enough heap memory to a node. Heap >>> memory >>> is still required,

Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-07-05 Thread Denis Magda
30 22:23 GMT+02:00 vkulichenko > <mailto:valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com>>: >> Hi Peter, >> >> It sound like you just don't give enough heap memory to a node. Heap memory >> is still required, even if you store all the data off heap. Can you try to >> yo

Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-07-05 Thread Peter Schmitt
;> is still required, even if you store all the data off heap. Can you try to >> your JVM at least 2GB and check if this helps? >> >> -Val >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p6028.html >> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com >> <http://nabble.com>. >> > > >

Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-07-05 Thread Denis Magda
the data off heap. Can you try to > your JVM at least 2GB and check if this helps? > > -Val > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p6028.html > > <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p6028.html> > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-07-03 Thread Peter Schmitt
> It sound like you just don't give enough heap memory to a node. Heap memory > is still required, even if you store all the data off heap. Can you try to > your JVM at least 2GB and check if this helps? > > -Val > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http

Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-06-30 Thread vkulichenko
e.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p6028.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-06-30 Thread Peter Schmitt
This doesn't make much sense to me. With OFFHEAP_TIERED eviction policy >> should not change anything at all, so it sounds like misconfiguration. Can >> you provide the whole test that I can run and investigate? >> >> -Val >> >> >> >> -- >> View t

Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-06-29 Thread Peter Schmitt
Can > you provide the whole test that I can run and investigate? > > -Val > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p5982.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-06-28 Thread vkulichenko
18.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p5982.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-06-28 Thread Peter Schmitt
herefore stores everything offheap. > > -Val > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p5978.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-06-28 Thread vkulichenko
he is OFFHEAP_TIERED and therefore stores everything offheap. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p5978.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-06-28 Thread Peter Schmitt
; > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p5971.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Non-cluster mode

2016-06-28 Thread vkulichenko
Hi Peter, Your code works fine for me. Can you please attach the log file? -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p5971.html Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Non-cluster mode

2016-06-28 Thread Peter Schmitt
Hello Ignite-Community! As a part of an evaluation of Ignite 1.6, I'm trying to use Ignite in a cluster *without* cluster-mode. It should be used as local cache (independent of the other nodes). Therefore, the (Ignite-)nodes shouldn't try to discover other (Ignite-)nodes. I tried TcpDiscovery