t;>
>> Kind regards
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-06-30 22:23 GMT+02:00 vkulichenko :
>>
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> It sound like you just don't give enough heap memory to a node. Heap
>>> memory
>>> is still required,
30 22:23 GMT+02:00 vkulichenko > <mailto:valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com>>:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> It sound like you just don't give enough heap memory to a node. Heap memory
>> is still required, even if you store all the data off heap. Can you try to
>> yo
;> is still required, even if you store all the data off heap. Can you try to
>> your JVM at least 2GB and check if this helps?
>>
>> -Val
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p6028.html
>> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
>> <http://nabble.com>.
>>
>
>
>
the data off heap. Can you try to
> your JVM at least 2GB and check if this helps?
>
> -Val
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p6028.html
>
> <http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p6028.html>
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> It sound like you just don't give enough heap memory to a node. Heap memory
> is still required, even if you store all the data off heap. Can you try to
> your JVM at least 2GB and check if this helps?
>
> -Val
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http
e.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p6028.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
This doesn't make much sense to me. With OFFHEAP_TIERED eviction policy
>> should not change anything at all, so it sounds like misconfiguration. Can
>> you provide the whole test that I can run and investigate?
>>
>> -Val
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View t
Can
> you provide the whole test that I can run and investigate?
>
> -Val
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p5982.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
18.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p5982.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
herefore stores everything offheap.
>
> -Val
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p5978.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
he is
OFFHEAP_TIERED and therefore stores everything offheap.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p5978.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
;
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p5971.html
> Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Hi Peter,
Your code works fine for me. Can you please attach the log file?
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Non-cluster-mode-tp5959p5971.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello Ignite-Community!
As a part of an evaluation of Ignite 1.6, I'm trying to use Ignite in a
cluster *without* cluster-mode.
It should be used as local cache (independent of the other nodes).
Therefore, the (Ignite-)nodes shouldn't try to discover other
(Ignite-)nodes.
I tried
TcpDiscovery
14 matches
Mail list logo