Re: Integration issue with enyimmecached client

2016-02-23 Thread vkulichenko
David, Ignite has to be compatible with memcached binary protocol, and if it's not, it has to be fixed. I will investigate this deeper and let you know. -Val -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Integration-issue-with-enyimmecached-client-tp3136p3164

Re: Integration issue with enyimmecached client

2016-02-23 Thread David Puebla Garcia
Val, No I do not know where there is a better binary protocol specification. I was just debugging it and found that inconsistency so this is why I pointed out to help on troubleshooting the issue. Is there any other specification that ignite uses to interpret the flags out of the memcached requ

RE: Integration issue with enyimmecached client

2016-02-22 Thread vkulichenko
David, OK, now I get it. I will take a closer look at this. Do you by any chance know where I can find good description of Memcache binary protocol? It sounds like you're quoting [1], which is actually text protocol. It's a different one. [1] https://github.com/memcached/memcached/blob/master/do

RE: Integration issue with enyimmecached client

2016-02-22 Thread David Puebla Garcia
Thank you David From: vkulichenko [valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 9:24 PM To: user@ignite.apache.org Subject: Re: Integration issue with enyimmecached client Hi David, Are you saying that the client sends the value wit

Re: Integration issue with enyimmecached client

2016-02-22 Thread vkulichenko
Hi David, Are you saying that the client sends the value with the boolean type flag set which causes it to be saved as a boolean in the cache? It sounds like a client issue, no? Let me know if I'm missing something. Actually, is it a requirement for you to use memcached client? Can you switch to