>Hi Zhenya,
>
>Thanks for the pointers - I will look into them.
>
>I have been doing some additional reading into this and discovered we are
>using a 4.0 NFS client, which seems to be the first 'no-no'; we will look at
>updating to use the 41 NFS client.
>
>We have modified our default ti
In (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Ignite+Persistent+Store+-+under+the+hood),
there is a mention of a dirty pages limit that is a factor that can trigger
check points.
I also found this issue:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/too-many-dirty-pages-td28572.html
whe
I'm working on getting automatic JVM thread stack dumping occurring if we
detect long delays in put (PutIfAbsent) operations. Hopefully this will
provide more information.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 7:48 PM Zhenya Stanilovsky
wrote:
>
> Don`t think so, checkpointing work perfectly well already befo
Don`t think so, checkpointing work perfectly well already before this fix.
Need additional info for start digging your problem, can you share ignite logs
somewhere?
>I noticed an entry in the Ignite 2.9.1 changelog:
>* Improved checkpoint concurrent behaviour
>I am having trouble finding the
