pta...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> Ack. I've create a JIRA to track this.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12334
>
>
>
> From: user@ignite.apache.org At: 10/28/19 09:08:10
> To: user@ignite.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Throttling getAll
>
> You might want to o
Ack. I've create a JIRA to track this.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12334
From: user@ignite.apache.org At: 10/28/19 09:08:10To: user@ignite.apache.org
Subject: Re: Throttling getAll
You might want to open a ticket. Of course, Ignite is open source and I’m sure
the community
You might want to open a ticket. Of course, Ignite is open source and I’m sure
the community would welcome a pull request.
Regards,
Stephen
> On 28 Oct 2019, at 12:14, Abhishek Gupta (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A)
> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Ilya for your response.
>
> Even if my value objects were not
Thanks Ilya for your response.
Even if my value objects were not large, nothing stops clients from doing a
getAll with say 100,000 keys. Having some kind of throttling would still be
useful.
-Abhishek
- Original Message -
From: Ilya Kasnacheev
To: ABHISHEK GUPTA
CC:
Hello!
Having very large objects is not a priority use case of Apache Ignite.
Thus, it is your concern to make sure you don't run out of heap when doing
operations on Ignite caches.
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
сб, 26 окт. 2019 г. в 18:51, Abhishek Gupta (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A) <
Hello,
I've benchmarked my grid for users (clients) to do getAll with upto 100
keys at a time. My value objects tend to be quite large and my worry is if
there are errant clients might at times do a getAll with a larger number of
keys - say 1000. If that happens I worry about GC
