Rajesh,
Whether you work with POJOs or with BinaryObject API, data is stored in the
same binary format which allows to get field values without deserialization.
Therefore indexing on binary data is possible. Please go through the
documentation page I provided earlier, it gives more detailed descri
Hi Val,
Would indices be possible on binary data value , I dont think so. I think I
will stick with the POJO for now.
I have queries on indices and l am not relying on external persistence
system.
a) What are the different indices type Ignite supports apart from equality
i.e does it support the
Rajesh,
This actually sounds exactly like binary format Ignite uses to store the
data: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/binary-marshaller
Doing this manually (i.e. explicitly saving some byte array and creating
indexes over this array) would not be possible, but I don't think you really
need i
Yes, correct object is stored as byte array
As my attribute name is not fixed.
I want to have index on different attributes which is not directly visible
as the pojo instance variable
Rajesh
On 19 Jan 2018 3:56 a.m., "vkulichenko"
wrote:
> Hi Rajesh,
>
> It's not clear what you're trying to ach
Hi Rajesh,
It's not clear what you're trying to achieve. So are you going to store the
attributes as a map or in serialized form as a byte array? And what exactly
should be indexed?
-Val
--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
Hi All,
The problem statement is in context of "In-Memory Data Grid" persistence
enabled.
I have requirement/limitation to store the value of a class's object as
byte [] , understood by the application in certain format.
IgniteCache cache =
ignite.getOrCreateCache(cacheCfg);
// here ke
