re: problem of using object as key in cache configurations

2016-04-14 Thread Zhengqingzheng
You are right Val, I did not read all the examples. Hopefully problem solved. Cheers, Kevin -邮件原件- 发件人: vkulichenko [mailto:valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2016年4月14日 14:34 收件人: user@ignite.apache.org 主题: Re: problem of using object as key in cache configurations We already have

Re: problem of using object as key in cache configurations

2016-04-14 Thread vkulichenko
We already have such examples. For example, CacheClientBinaryPutGetExample. But I agree with Andrey that this message is very confusing. I will fix it shortly. -Val -- View this message in context:

Re: problem of using object as key in cache configurations

2016-04-13 Thread kevin.zheng
I think ignite should add example codes or document to tell the beginners. I did search the forum but no results. but the error log message did give me hint on where the problem might be occurred (in my case, the object serialization part). -- View this message in context:

Re: problem of using object as key in cache configurations

2016-04-13 Thread Andrey Kornev
Hello,A few teams at our company have independently run into this issue and ended up each wasting time figuring out how to fix it. And this is not the first time I see people asking this very same question here. I wonder if it is possible to improve diagnostics in Ignite code and log a more

Re: problem of using object as key in cache configurations

2016-04-13 Thread kevin.zheng
Finally, I found the solution: I need to use "cache.withKeepBinary()" to call the query method when the cache Key is an object type. -- View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/problem-of-using-object-as-key-in-cache-configurations-tp4116p4146.html Sent

problem of using object as key in cache configurations

2016-04-13 Thread kevin.zheng
Dear all,I have a table which has no primary index (need to use two columns as composite index).at the beginning, I use only one column as key to load all the data into the cache. However, lots of records were ignored ( because they have the same key).Then I create an java object to store two