Re: Response Assertion: extended regex ignore case syntax not working as documented

2022-02-18 Thread Philippe Mouawad
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 12:38 PM Felix Schumacher < felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > I told Hartmut to take the discussion on list, as I think it has a wider > audience and changing the implementation could introduce a changed > behaviour in test plans. > Yes good idea

Re: Response Assertion: extended regex ignore case syntax not working as documented

2022-02-18 Thread Felix Schumacher
Hi Philippe, I told Hartmut to take the discussion on list, as I think it has a wider audience and changing the implementation could introduce a changed behaviour in test plans. I hadn't thought of Bug 57672, but remembered an older discussion on (dev?) mailing list, where the possible

Re: Response Assertion: extended regex ignore case syntax not working as documented

2022-02-17 Thread Philippe Mouawad
Hello, The migration from Oro to Java regex is identified for a while now under: - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57672 Still, as you know, this project is based on volunteers work. If you feel like contributing this enhancement you'll be welcome. Otherwise you may have to wait

Response Assertion: extended regex ignore case syntax not working as documented

2022-02-17 Thread Honisch, Hartmut
Hi team, I noticed that regex patterns in "Response Assertions" using "(?i)" and "(?-i)" to enable / disable case insensitive matching for certain parts of the regex pattern don't work as they're supposed to. For example the regex "(?i)apple(?-i) Pie" does NOT match "ApPLe Pie", even though it