Matt you had built me a specialized one and I think it lives on our xdata machine somewhere I’ll take a look but if you still have it that would be grand
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On 4/5/16, 12:46 PM, "Matt Post" <p...@cs.jhu.edu> wrote: > > > >Can you not use the posted Spanish → English language pack? > > > > >On Apr 5, 2016, at 12:34 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >That was my concern Matt. Thanks for the explanation. >Basically I've been passed a packed grammar for Spanish --> English >translation (possibly one you built for Chris M. While back) and wondered if I >could package it into a language pack. It seems that without the accompanying >parameters we've discussed > its usefulness is questionable. > >On Tuesday, April 5, 2016, Matt Post <p...@cs.jhu.edu> wrote: > >Hi Lewis, > > >I would suggest taking another language pack and just copying that over. You >can delete the language model and grammars from it, and then edit the >joshua.config to do the following: > > >- Remove the language model lines: > > >feature-function = StateMinimizingLanguageModel ... >feature-function = LanguageModel ... > > >- Modify the ^tm lines to point to your new grammar. You will want to keep the >glue grammar. Also, the tm specification should match the type of grammar you >learned (set to "thrax" if it was a hiero grammar, or to "phrase" or "moses" >if a phrase > or moses one). > > >That said, what are you doing this for? It's unlikely to work very well >without a language model, and without tuned parameters. > > >matt > > > > > >On Apr 5, 2016, at 12:54 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com ><javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >Hi Folks, > >Does anyone know if it is possible to bundle a language pack without input for >the mandatory arguments as documented at [0]? > >Say for example I was passed a packed grammar which was built from a pipeline >execution however no accompanying configuration file, the tuned configuration >file, etc. was provided as well. > >Any help is appreciated. > >Thanks > >Lewis > >[0] >http://joshua-decoder.org/6.0/bundle.html ><http://joshua-decoder.org/6.0/bundle.html> > >-- >Lewis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- >Lewis > > > > > > >
