Re: Karaf-4.0.8 - bundle:watch timezone issue

Sure: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4943 Erwin > On Jan 15, 2017, at 12:25, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi Erwin, > > it looks you found a bug. Do you mind to create a Jira about that ? > > Thanks >

RE: Karaf IoT

In my current project I am using the "DS multiton" pattern for GPIO pins, that is to say: I have a configuration-required component with the name "gpio.pin.factory", which registers a GpioPin service, and I have an immediate "configurator" component which reads a set of configurations from

Re: Karaf-4.0.8 - bundle:watch timezone issue

Hi Erwin, it looks you found a bug. Do you mind to create a Jira about that ? Thanks Regards JB On 01/15/2017 02:50 PM, Erwin Hogeweg wrote: Hi, I noticed that bundle:watch kept restarting the same bundles over-and-over again. After some digging I believe this behavior is caused by

Karaf-4.0.8 - bundle:watch timezone issue

Hi, I noticed that bundle:watch kept restarting the same bundles over-and-over again. After some digging I believe this behavior is caused by BundleWatchImpl:163 if (location != null && location.exists() && location.lastModified() > bundle.getLastModified()) { The

Re: Wire Admin Service

Thanks Chris, I'll take a look. I had read elsewhere and got the impression that 'hard-wiring' connections doesn't fit with the OSGi model however I'm not entirely convinced, dependent upon the application of course. I need to read through the spec in full to get a good understanding of it but

Re: Wire Admin Service

Knopflerfish certainly has an implementation, and I believe Equinox and mBS have also. But I would agree that it's not widely used (I have never used it myself). Maybe because the idea of explicitly creating point-to-point connections does not really fit the OSGi model? > Hello All, > > This

Wire Admin Service

Hello All, This isn't specific to Karaf but I wondered if anyone knows if there are any implementations of the OSGi Wire Admin service specification (chapter 108 of of the OSGi compendium spec.) Looks like this is not a widely used spec? Thanks, Kerry