Re: Karaf: feature satisfy requirements

>> Should I create a Jira + PR if it is working? > Sure, but it would be interesting to do a complete pass on the services > provided by each framework for completeness. You could have a look at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4980

Re: Karaf Cave vs Apache ACE

Hi They are pretty close for the repository. Ace also implements the deployment specification whereas Cave relays on Karaf features. Regards JB On Feb 5, 2017, 19:39, at 19:39, Dev Sidious wrote: >Hello, > >Quote from Apache ACE page: >"Apache ACE is a software

Re: Karaf: feature satisfy requirements

2017-02-06 9:49 GMT+01:00 Markus Rathgeb : > That looks good, thanks a lot. > > Do you think this is something others are interested in? > Should I create a Jira + PR if it is working? > Sure, but it would be interesting to do a complete pass on the services provided by each

Re: Karaf: feature satisfy requirements

That looks good, thanks a lot. Do you think this is something others are interested in? Should I create a Jira + PR if it is working? 2017-02-06 9:21 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Nodet : > The best option is to: > * fix the system bundle capabilities > * use a dependency feature as

Re: Karaf: feature satisfy requirements

The best option is to: * fix the system bundle capabilities * use a dependency feature as you did To fix the system bundle capabilities, depending on the framework used, you can do something along the following: org.osgi.framework.system.capabilities=\ ...\ ${${framework}-capabilities}

Re: Karaf: feature satisfy requirements

Hi Guillaume, thank you for your reply. In this special case it is about an implementation for "javax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory" and a service for that. The bundle "org.eclipse.equinox.registry" (I need to use to satisfy third party dependencies) is using a tracker to find an implementation