Hi,
OK, I understand. Actually, the issue is more on keycloak IMHO. It should
leverage the http provider as well (so supporting jetty) and the features is
"so so".
Unfortunately, I don’t have any "entry point" at keycloak so we have to trust
the keycloak guys to accept PR or fix themselves.
R
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the update.
As said in another mail, issues should be fixed/improved at keycloak.
Waiting fixes in keycloak directly, maybe it’s interesting to evaluate some
alternatives (maybe a mix of Syncope or Shiro for instance).
Regards
JB
> Le 2 juin 2020 à 05:55, Christian L
Hello Alex, JB
I asked the same question some time ago here[1].
And it took me some time to figure out how the get it up and running.
First of all there is a bug in keycloak that prevents it from using it with
jetty. I have created a PR[2] to fix it.
But it hasn’t been merged yet.
Also the c
Greetings,
ECF has a new remote services distribution provider based upon Google
RPC (gRPC) [1] available here [2].
To support easy creation of remote services that use this distribution
provider is a protoc plugin [3] that generates a service interface class
from a .proto file service decla
Thanks, JB,
Unfortunately, my app depends heavily on Camel. I would be interested in a
way to make Keycloak work with default Jetty, this will probably be easier than
replacing Jetty with Undertow at this point. Any help will be appreciated.
Best regards,
Alex soto
> On Jun 1, 2020, at
Add etc/org.apache.karaf.features.xml containing:
pax-http-jetty
The purpose is to avoid to install this feature.
However, be careful, some third party projects (like camel or cxf) directly use
jetty feature. I identify some issue about that and I will upda
Blacklist? How?
Best regards,
Alex soto
> On Jun 1, 2020, at 3:11 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
>
> Just installing the pax web undertow feature will add the HTTP undertow
> provider capability. You just have to blacklist jetty feature and it should
> be fine.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>> Le
Just installing the pax web undertow feature will add the HTTP undertow
provider capability. You just have to blacklist jetty feature and it should be
fine.
Regards
JB
> Le 1 juin 2020 à 21:09, Alex Soto a écrit :
>
> If I have to use Undertow, I’d be willing to try it, but there is little or
If I have to use Undertow, I’d be willing to try it, but there is little or no
info on how to switch Pax-Web to use Undertow.
I don’t have any particular need to use Jetty, just trying to be isolated from
this by Pax-Web.
Best regards,
Alex soto
> On Jun 1, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste
Hi JB,
Can you share your workaround? Thanks!
Best regards,
Alex soto
> On Jun 1, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I have something (not with the latest keycloak) but I had to "fix" the
> keycloak feature.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>> Le 1 juin 2020 à 16:30, A
Hi,
Yes, I have something (not with the latest keycloak) but I had to "fix" the
keycloak feature.
Regards
JB
> Le 1 juin 2020 à 16:30, Alex Soto a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> Anybody has a working example of Pax-Web with Jetty, and Keycloak?
> The Jetty features are commented out in the Keycloa
Hello,
Anybody has a working example of Pax-Web with Jetty, and Keycloak?
The Jetty features are commented out in the Keycloak
keycloak-osgi-features-10.0.1 /features.xml file:
Best regards,
Alex soto
> On May 29, 2020, at 4:19 PM, Alex Soto wrote:
>
> I am looking for the same, di
12 matches
Mail list logo
