> Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> yes, the docker image is arm based. I'm adding multi-arch image
> support (to have x86 images as well).
> I will upload new images soon.
Great! Thanks, JB!
> Francois Papon :
> It means that your docker image is not immutable and after starting
> the Karaf instance, it will download the updated dependencies features
> at startup right?
Correct! :-)
> It's not the common design for docker image and I think it's better to
> have a custom Karaf di
Hi,
yes, the docker image is arm based. I'm adding multi-arch image
support (to have x86 images as well).
I will upload new images soon.
Regards
JB
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 7:36 PM Steinar Bang wrote:
>
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
>
> > Hi Steinar
> > Let me check about the image type.
>
> Did
It means that your docker image is not immutable and after starting the
Karaf instance, it will download the updated dependencies features at
startup right?
It's not the common design for docker image and I think it's better to
have a custom Karaf distribution and build a new docker image afte
> Francois Papon :
> Why not using Jib?
> https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/jib/tree/master
Unless I'm very mistaken that doesn't do what I want to do.
Jib looks like it is for containering a Java application?
What I'm doing is something different:
1. I start out with a standard kar
Hi,
Why not using Jib?
https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/jib/tree/master
regards,
François
On 08/01/2024 19:36, Steinar Bang wrote:
Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
Hi Steinar
Let me check about the image type.
Did you find out anything?
The docker-maven-plugin I've been using (the one create
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> Hi Steinar
> Let me check about the image type.
Did you find out anything?
The docker-maven-plugin I've been using (the one created by spotify),
was abandoned a couple of years back:
https://github.com/spotify/docker-maven-plugin
So I've been trying to to use a d
Hi Steinar
Let me check about the image type.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 5:44 PM Steinar Bang wrote:
>
> > Steinar Bang :
> [snip!]
> > Or try out the, completely different, docker-maven-plugin that comes up
> > first on google searches?
> > https://github.com/fabric8io/docker-mave
> Steinar Bang :
[snip!]
> Or try out the, completely different, docker-maven-plugin that comes up
> first on google searches?
> https://github.com/fabric8io/docker-maven-plugin
> I guess try out the new one.
Not much luck with the new one, so far:
https://github.com/fabric8io/docker-maven-
I just noticed that I'm using an archived and dead docker-maven-plugin
https://github.com/steinarb/sonar-collector/blob/b0d6cedb35648df11ef1554b9fb8fbe669e94640/docker/pom.xml#L32
https://github.com/spotify/docker-maven-plugin?tab=readme-ov-file
Archived on March 21 2022 and last commit from Se
FWIW The reason that I'm trying to update sonar-collector's docker image
is that I discovered that sonar-collector actually has a user, and that
user uses the docker image which suddenly stopped working:
https://github.com/steinarb/sonar-collector/issues/5
The way I've created the docker image is
I'm trying to build an updated docker image for my sonar-collector
project, based on the official karaf 4.4.4 image:
https://github.com/steinarb/sonar-collector
However even though I'm building the docker image on an amd64 debian
12.4 "bookworm" system, the resulting docker image seems to be an a
12 matches
Mail list logo