Re: Karaf Cave usage

2015-04-20 Thread Frank Lyaruu
I think Nexus community edition also supports OBR now, they have a plugin for that. regards, Frank On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Morgan Hautman morgan.haut...@gmail.com wrote: I'm a little confused now, since Cave is the same as Nexus pro, why adding OBR support to Archiva when you got

Re: Karaf Cave usage

2015-04-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Moreover, Cave can act as OBR frontend on top of any existing Maven repo. As a reminder, the simplest Maven remote repo is just a HTTP server exposing a directory following the Maven directories structure (groupId/artifactId/version/artifactId-version[-classifier].type). For instance, I have

Re: Karaf Cave usage

2015-04-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Correct, Nexus Pro has OBR support. By the way, I'm working on Archiva to add OBR support too. Regards JB On 04/20/2015 08:06 AM, Morgan Hautman wrote: To me it sounds like a nexus pro repo since they only have OBR in their pro version. Is this correct? Regards Morgan On 19/04/2015 20:04,

Re: Karaf Cave usage

2015-04-20 Thread Achim Nierbeck
Cave is more like a OBR only, while Archiva is more like plain nexus regards, Achim 2015-04-20 9:08 GMT+02:00 Morgan Hautman morgan.haut...@gmail.com: I'm a little confused now, since Cave is the same as Nexus pro, why adding OBR support to Archiva when you got Cave already? Regards,

Re: Karaf Cave usage

2015-04-20 Thread Morgan Hautman
I'm a little confused now, since Cave is the same as Nexus pro, why adding OBR support to Archiva when you got Cave already? Regards, Morgan 20/04/2015 9:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Correct, Nexus Pro has OBR support. By the way, I'm working on Archiva to add OBR support too. Regards JB

Re: Karaf Cave usage

2015-04-20 Thread Morgan Hautman
To me it sounds like a nexus pro repo since they only have OBR in their pro version. Is this correct? Regards Morgan On 19/04/2015 20:04, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: No, Cave is on top of the local dev server. Or the CI can deploy on the Cave server. The Karaf instance bootstrapped by the

Karaf Cave usage

2015-04-19 Thread Ryan Moquin
Hi, I've been looking at Apache Cave and how to best leverage it. I had a few questions as a result. My first one was about how to keep Cave up to date with changes to a proxied company maven repository, such as artifactory. For example, if your continuous integration server is pushing new

Re: Karaf Cave usage

2015-04-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
I guess that you mean when Cave is used as an OBR server. In that case, you have to update the OBR repository metadata by performing a new scan. There are different use cases to Cave: 1/ you need an OBR server and you only have a Maven repo (in production) 2/ you don't have any existing Maven

Re: Karaf Cave usage

2015-04-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
No, Cave is on top of the local dev server. Or the CI can deploy on the Cave server. The Karaf instance bootstrapped by the itests can use the OBR server. Regards JB On 04/19/2015 07:57 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote: Yes, sorry, I meant as an OBR server. I wasn't meaning use cases for Cave, I was

Re: Karaf Cave usage

2015-04-19 Thread Ryan Moquin
Yes, sorry, I meant as an OBR server. I wasn't meaning use cases for Cave, I was just trying to understand how CI servers and Cave are handled as part of the build and deploy process. It seems that a rescan would have to be invoked quite frequently to detect new artifacts deployed to a Maven