then that disparate manufacturers could use to provide those capabilities to
their clients.
-Original Message-
From: chris.g...@kiffer.ltd.uk [mailto:chris.g...@kiffer.ltd.uk]
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2017 3:21 PM
To: user@karaf.apache.org
Subject: RE: Karaf IoT
In my current project I am using
PPM values
> for my motor. It will also export its MotorControllerService with
> appropriate identifier for use by the application bundle.
>
> So the configuration and exports stay with the bundles that are concerned
> with the specifics of each level of abstraction.
>
>
> -
rts stay with the bundles that are concerned with
the specifics of each level of abstraction.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lewis [mailto:sle...@composent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 8:24 PM
To: user@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Karaf IoT
I think this tutorial [1] describ
y 4, 2017 4:25 PM
To: user@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Karaf IoT
Brad,
If you have service dependant on presence of some board you can make it
conditional. Just use OSGi service lifecycle to deregister service when device
is disconnected. Service consumers should be aware of it or at le
-
From: Łukasz Dywicki [mailto:l...@code-house.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 4:25 PM
To: user@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Karaf IoT
Brad,
If you have service dependant on presence of some board you can make it
conditional. Just use OSGi service lifecycle to deregister service when
int the proxy would be injected and with DS, I
believe, the consumer bundle wouldn't be started until the correct service is
ready to be injected.
-Original Message-
From: Łukasz Dywicki [mailto:l...@code-house.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 4:25 PM
To: user@karaf.apache.org
Su
--
> From: Łukasz Dywicki [mailto:l...@code-house.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 2:54 PM
> To: user@karaf.apache.org
> Cc: Markus Rathgeb
> Subject: Re: Karaf IoT
>
> I am OpenHab (OH) 2 user and I I must say that whole PDE thing is redundant
> from my Karaf (as a pl
=
gpioController.provisionDigitalMultipurposePin(RaspiPin.GPIO_05,
PinMode.DIGITAL_OUTPUT);
}
-Original Message-
From: Łukasz Dywicki [mailto:l...@code-house.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 2:54 PM
To: user@karaf.apache.org
Cc: Markus Rathgeb
Subject: Re: Karaf IoT
I am OpenHab (O
well please keep me in mind when you do sort something out. i am designing
a project now and was looking at both kura and openhab for it
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
> I am OpenHab (OH) 2 user and I I must say that whole PDE thing is
> redundant from my Karaf (as a plat
I am OpenHab (OH) 2 user and I I must say that whole PDE thing is redundant
from my Karaf (as a platform) point of view. But this all comes from past of
project which was launched with Tycho and PDE since early days. There are
multiple entities involved in project and it is not an easy task to r
actually complies with the standard.
Brad
From: Jason Pratt [mailto:jpratt3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 12:05 PM
To: user@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Karaf IoT
scott/brad do you guys have a repo setup for this project?
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:39 AM
pplications.
>
> Brad
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Scott Lewis [mailto:sle...@composent.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 9:33 PM
> To: user@karaf.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Karaf IoT
>
> On 1/2/2017 11:35 AM, Brad Red Hat wrote:
> > I cert
r manufacturers go to add new high level device specific
bundles for use in applications.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lewis [mailto:sle...@composent.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 9:33 PM
To: user@karaf.apache.org
Subject: Re: Karaf IoT
On 1/2/2017 11:35 AM, Brad Red Hat wrote:
>
On 1/2/2017 11:35 AM, Brad Red Hat wrote:
I certainly understand the "short of time" problem. It just happens that I
have a bit of a window right now and would like to get into it a bit deeper.
Whether a Karaf/PAX/Felix implementation is more appropriate under the aegis
of Kura or as a separate
Sent: Monday, January 2, 2017 12:57 PM
To: user@karaf.apache.org
Subject: RE: Karaf IoT
I share most of Brad's concerns; at first I was very interested in OpenHAB
but after playing with it for a bit I began to think about designing a new
service layer and then seeing if I could fit
I share most of Brad's concerns; at first I was very interested in OpenHAB
but after playing with it for a bit I began to think about designing a new
service layer and then seeing if I could fit the OpenHAB native libraries
to it.
OpenHAB corroborates my "PDE considered harmful" theory; it must be
really seeing. It
is that OSGi service thinking that I'm not seeing in the project. I'm sure the
Kura project would be amenable to some of those changes. But as I said up
front, my concerns aren't about any single aspect.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: Markus Rathgeb [m
Hi,
> I'm not really an expert, but I know the openHAB project, which AFAIK uses
> Eclipse Kura, is based on Karaf.
openHAB 2 is using the Eclipse SmartHome framework.
openHAB 2 is running on Karaf.
Hi Brad,
I'm not really an expert, but I know the openHAB project, which AFAIK uses
Eclipse Kura, is based on Karaf.
At least version 2.0 is. Maybe this can also be a pointer for you to look
at.
regards, Achim
2017-01-02 1:37 GMT+01:00 Brad Red Hat :
> I was looking at the Kura project for futu
I was looking at the Kura project for future development and a move toward
IoT development. Unfortunately I have several issues with the project which
are not going to be solved by simply becoming a contributor. It made me
wonder if there's been any discussion about a similar project using
Felix/
20 matches
Mail list logo
