Re: Shall we define the base cuboid?

2017-11-22 Thread 杨浩
1, est MB: 165.84, >> shrink: 100% > > | Cuboid 0001010011, est row: 10063, est MB: >> 168.55, shrink: 101.64% > > | Cuboid 00010110110011, est row: 10004, est MB: >> 167.56, shrink: 99.41% > > | Cuboid 0

Re: Shall we define the base cuboid?

2017-11-22 Thread Li Yang
/kylin.apache.org/blog/2016/02/18/new-aggregat >>> ion-group/ , two aggs are defined in the last. The AGG1 is base cuboid, >>> shall we define it explicity? It seems the base cuboid is computed implicit >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> Shaofeng Shi 史少锋 >> >> >

Re: Shall we define the base cuboid?

2017-11-19 Thread 杨浩
T+08:00 杨浩 <yangha...@gmail.com>: > >> As in the article http://kylin.apache.org/blog/2016/02/18/new-aggregat >> ion-group/ , two aggs are defined in the last. The AGG1 is base cuboid, >> shall we define it explicity? It seems the base cuboid is computed implicit >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > > Shaofeng Shi 史少锋 > >

Re: Shall we define the base cuboid?

2017-11-19 Thread ShaoFeng Shi
ase > cuboid, shall we define it explicity? It seems the base cuboid is computed > implicit > > -- Best regards, Shaofeng Shi 史少锋